Re: [css-d] a:hover vs images with alpha chanel

2008/8/5 snak detek+0r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > does anyone have a good way of universally disabling > >a:hover{background-color} > > for images? i always have this problem, and i'm never satisfied with the > solution. it seems that you could fix it by styling > >a img {background-col

Re: [css-d] a:hover vs images with alpha chanel

On Aug 5, 2008, at 12:27 PM, snak detek+0r wrote: > does anyone have a good way of universally disabling > > a:hover{background-color} > > for images? i always have this problem, and i'm never satisfied with > the > solution. it seems that you could fix it by styling > > a img {back

Re: [css-d] a:hover vs images with alpha chanel

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > snak detek+0r > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 5:28 PM > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: [css-d] a:hover vs images with alpha chanel > > hi there, > > does anyone have a good way of unive

[css-d] :: Mac Safari Display Problem ::

Hi Yesterday I opened my portfolio website www.awayback.com using Safari (Mac) and it showed unexpected line height and font size of sifr embedded headers. I have good knowledge of CSS however I thought asking list before started digging on my own because guys here have best answers. My websit

[css-d] a:hover vs images with alpha chanel

hi there, does anyone have a good way of universally disabling a:hover{background-color} for images? i always have this problem, and i'm never satisfied with the solution. it seems that you could fix it by styling a img {background-color: transparent} or a:hover img {

Re: [css-d] Font Size difference

Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote: > Helen > > I think I am beginning to understand. That's nice (you did have me worried there for a brief moment). > I think I will try to increase the font size of "Greenwich Mean Time says > ... " font size to the "Choroideremia Research Fondation Inc" in t

Re: [css-d] Font Size difference

Helen Thank you for your hard work. I think I am beginning to understand. I think I will try to increase the font size of "Greenwich Mean Time says ... " font size to the "Choroideremia Research Fondation Inc" in the header. Then move this into a space right under the curve graphic and position

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

Bill Brown wrote: > Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > >> No, it is completely true. The 'opacity' property applies to the whole >> box and its descendants. >> >> Using RGBA/HSLA colours is a completely different game. You don't use >> or affect the opacity of the box, only use a semi-transparent

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > No, it is completely true. The 'opacity' property applies to the whole > box and its descendants. > > Using RGBA/HSLA colours is a completely different game. You don't use > or affect the opacity of the box, only use a semi-transparent colour > (value) for the b

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

On Aug 5, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Bill Brown wrote: > This isn't /entirely/ true, as is alluded to in the link that Philippe > has included in his reply. > > A strange combination of RGBA, IE's gradient filter and data:uri (or a > png) will allow you to achieve a cross-browser, > semi-to-fully-transpar

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > On Aug 5, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Karl Bedingfield wrote: >> Is there a way to keep my h2 text full opacity while the background >> colour is at 50% opacity? > NO. > This has been asked on the list a few times recently. > See e.g. >

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

On Aug 5, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Karl Bedingfield wrote: > Is there a way to keep my h2 text full opacity while the background > colour is at 50% opacity? NO. This has been asked on the list a few times recently. See e.g.

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

At 11:45 AM -0400 8/4/08, Bill Brown wrote: >Hey folks, > >For a while now, most of my projects have been authentication-required >deals, making it difficult to have anyone view/review them. I'm now >working on the final stages of a website which isn't protected from >public view and thought I'd ch

Re: [css-d] Font Size difference

Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote: > I took a copy of the code you gave me and probably messed it up in trying to > understand. I thought I had the font size in Firefox 3.0.1 and IE7 licked. > However, IE7 will display "Greenwich Mean Time says ... " and everything else > in 15 point Arial. And

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

> > Without Images: Looking at a page without images (disable them using > > the Firefox web developer tool bar) shows you what it might be like on a > > brutally slow connection. Pretty good in this view, though I loose the > > page title and the top links are unreadable in this instance so you

[css-d] bg img 1px too far to left or right in some browsers

URL: http://www.objectivedesigns.com/amittius/index.htm CSS: http://www.objectivedesigns.com/amittius/index.css (Tested only on WinXP Pro) Safari and Opera show the page's background image correctly regarding its position in relation to the rest of the site content (successfully centers everything

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Thierry Koblentz wrote: > The tabs look good in FF2/Win. > As a side note, adding "tabindex=0" to your DTs should allow keyboard users > to access these tabs and trigger the script. Hey there, Thierry. Excellent point. I did just that and uploaded the changes. Now, I think I might implement the ar

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

> Also implemented some Mozilla proprietary code to fix FF2 > inline-block...that should help keep the tabs a little more "inline." I > don't have FF2 anymore (Win nor Mac), so if someone wants to double > check that, I'd be most appreciative. Hi Bill, The tabs look good in FF2/Win. As a side not

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Adam Ducker wrote: > First Glance: The page looks good. Loads quickly. A little busy with > graphics for my taste but that's a personal preference. The page > resizes nicely in large and small windows. Gotcha. With regard to the images, it's a Flash conversion and was very image intensive. I'v

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

David Laakso wrote: > The tab font ascenders kiss the chrome on all my browsers-- too tight. > Not too freak out, but I prefer your page with images disabled-- > darkness and diagonals always scare me. > Isak Dinesen LOL! OK, "Isak" and Ingo (et al)-- I killed the diagonals. I have little contro

[css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

Hi there, Many thanks for all your help. The last post fixed all :) Is there a way to keep my h2 text full opacity while the background colour is at 50% opacity? Thanks Karl >> The trouble is, I cannot get the h2 #000; background to fade. It is >> always a solid balck. > > Did you try adding a

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

Hi there, Many thanks for all your help. The last post fixed all :) Is there a way to keep my h2 text full opacity while the background colour is at 50% opacity? Thanks Karl >> The trouble is, I cannot get the h2 #000; background to fade. It is >> always a solid balck. > > Did you try adding a

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Chris Akins wrote: > I'm sending this to you off list so I can attach the screenshots. I > hadn't clicked on the top links before so I never saw the panels. It > does appear - my opinion - that the top tabs are slightly too high as > the actual text bumps the top edge of the viewport. I think th

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

David Laakso wrote: > ... > Not too freak out, but I prefer your page with images disabled-- > darkness and diagonals always scare me. > > Isak Dinesen > The diagonals are scaring me, too. Ingo -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html http://www.dolphinsback.com _

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Bill Brown wrote: > It's only the template as I'll be layering in the various modules over > the next few days, but here's the basic template: > > http://www.researchstevemccurry.com/ > > > Bill > > > mac os x 10.4.11 I did not see any grave issues in FF/3.0.1, or the latest versions of Ope

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Bill Brown wrote: > I'm now > working on the final stages of a website which isn't protected from > public view and thought I'd check to see if anybody sees any problems. > > http://www.researchstevemccurry.com/ > > If anybody has a second to take a look, I'm particularly interested in > Mac ren

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Chris Akins wrote: > In FF 2.0 on my Mac the links at the very top of the page (upper > right) - login, register, etc. - are missing on their top edge. I > didn't review the CSS at all, but it appears maybe they have a > negative top margin? Whatever it is is taking their top edge right > out of

Re: [css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

In FF 2.0 on my Mac the links at the very top of the page (upper right) - login, register, etc. - are missing on their top edge. I didn't review the CSS at all, but it appears maybe they have a negative top margin? Whatever it is is taking their top edge right out of the viewport. Hope that help

[css-d] Peer Review: Mockup/Template

Hey folks, For a while now, most of my projects have been authentication-required deals, making it difficult to have anyone view/review them. I'm now working on the final stages of a website which isn't protected from public view and thought I'd check to see if anybody sees any problems. It's onl

[css-d] css positonal issues on site

I have a website that I'm trying to finish up and am having text and positional issues with it. http://www.webgirlwebdesigns.com/testing/Krumm/index.html The menu seems to spread out on some pages and the text spacing is screwy depending on the browser. I have validated it in DW and no errors

Re: [css-d] CSS Opacity with tags. Can this be done in CSS?

Hello >The trouble is, I cannot get the h2 #000; background to fade. It is >always a solid balck. Where I had to do something similar (if I understand your question correctly), I had to add _height: 0; /* for IE 6 and lower haslayout */ zoom: 1;/* for IE7 haslayout */ to make it work in MSIE