[email protected]

Aaron Gray wrote: > ... IE, even IE 7 does not support CSS Child Selectors ! As Philippe said, IE7 does in Standardsmode. > I was wondering whether there is a work around at all Does this help, including the comments section? http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/05/31/universal-child-replaceme

Re: [css-d] Styling the element

Even the border's not a perfect solution. It's fine in FF3 but appears about three pixels wide in IE7. I haven't tried IE6 yet. Is this a box model problem; I thought they had been resolved in IE7 ? http://www.holidaymullandiona.co.uk/ Tim Dawson wrote: > Thank you. Of course. I got so comp

Re: [css-d] Styling the element

Thank you. Of course. I got so completely fixated on the first thing I thought of that the obvious passed me by. Tim Aubrey Benasa wrote: > Hi Tim, > > I think you can just call out a border on just one side of your 800px wide > image, i.e.: > > img {border-bottom:1px solid #fff; } > > hth

Re: [css-d] Footer position problem - IE6

Jeff Reid wrote: > I was informed that the text in the footer is not positioned > correctly in IE6 but not having immediate access to IE6, I am unable > to verify this tonight. > http://www.atbcelebrations.com/newsite/ #main-right is dropping in IE6, pushing footer down. It's caused by IE6' "auto

[email protected]

On Sep 11, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > ... only to find out the IE, even IE 7 does not support CSS Child > Selectors ! IE 7 supports child selectors just fine. You document _must_ be in standards mode, however (that is, start with a valid doctype). If your document lacks a doctype,

[css-d] HT Conditional CSS

Hi ; Looking for a way to make Opera behave in a certain manner, I googelised this http://conditional-css.com/ Did you know about that ? Cordially Luis __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/list

[css-d] Footer position problem - IE6

I was informed that the text in the footer is not positioned correctly in IE6 but not having immediate access to IE6, I am unable to verify this tonight. Can someone take a look in IE7 and IE6 to see if there are variances. http://www.atbcelebrations.com/newsite/ http://www.atbcelebrations.com

Re: [css-d] my tests on the SVN of the CSS Working Group

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:26:22 +0200, Gabriele Romanato wrote: > http://test.csswg.org/svn/CSS2.1-test-suite/incoming/gabriele/ > > you can see directly the various changes to my latest tests. keep in mind > that actually > 70% of my old test won't be filed here. only the latest and good ones. > Hi

Re: [css-d] [Slightly OT] Font sizes

On 12/09/2008, at 10:36 AM, David Laakso wrote: > > A Dao of Web Design > >> >> >>> Not sure i can use this one as a reference. It is designed for us to >>> read and learn from. Plus it does not conform to 100% body text >>> size. >>> >

Re: [css-d] [Slightly OT] Font sizes

A Dao of Web Design >>> >>> > > >> Not sure i can use this one as a reference. It is designed for us to >> read and learn from. Plus it does not conform to 100% body text size. >> > > Would be good if its CSS was consistent

Re: [css-d] Styling the element

Hi Tim, I think you can just call out a border on just one side of your 800px wide image, i.e.: img {border-bottom:1px solid #fff; } hth, aubrey On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Tim Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to draw a single white horizontal line, 800px wide, 1px high, > betwe

[css-d] Styling the element

I want to draw a single white horizontal line, 800px wide, 1px high, between two images. I know this could be done by adding a line to one of the images, but they already exist (in several variants) and I was hoping not to have to modify them all. I'd like to use the element if possible. Firefo

Re: [css-d] [Slightly OT] Font sizes

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:12:01 -0400 David Laakso increased personal carbon footprint by exciting electrons the world over with these memorable words: > Michael Adams wrote: > > Does anyone have a good article, and/or a reference to WCAG, that i > > can use to support the idea that default text size

Re: [css-d] [Slightly OT] Font sizes

On 2008/09/12 08:41 (GMT+1200) Michael Adams composed: > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:12:01 -0400 > David Laakso increased personal carbon footprint by exciting electrons > the world over with these memorable words: >> Michael Adams wrote: >> > Does anyone have a good article, and/or a reference to W

Re: [css-d] [Slightly OT] Font sizes

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:12:01 -0400 David Laakso increased personal carbon footprint by exciting electrons the world over with these memorable words: > Michael Adams wrote: > > Does anyone have a good article, and/or a reference to WCAG, that i > > can use to support the idea that default text size

[email protected]

>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:03:40 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> I have written the beginnings of a tree control widget. It works on all >> modern browsers >> bar IE. I was trying to get what I had written to work on IE then I tried >> it on FF and >> friends and it worked fine, only to find out the IE,

[css-d] my tests on the SVN of the CSS Working Group

http://test.csswg.org/svn/CSS2.1-test-suite/incoming/gabriele/ you can see directly the various changes to my latest tests. keep in mind that actually 70% of my old test won't be filed here. only the latest and good ones. xxx ^.^ -- http://www.css-zibaldone.com/ http://www.css-zibaldone.com/tes

Re: [css-d] IE 6 not honoring CSS border-spacing and only cellspacing?how about cellpadding?

liketo findoutwhy wrote: > There was something I read about border-spacing in CSS being able to > adjust the table's border spacing, replacing HTML's attribute > cellspacing="0", but then IE 6 won't honor it and it still requires > the cellspacing="0" to make it work. Even IE 7 doesn't support bo

[email protected]

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:03:40 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > I have written the beginnings of a tree control widget. It works on all > modern browsers > bar IE. I was trying to get what I had written to work on IE then I tried it > on FF and > friends and it worked fine, only to find out the IE, even

[css-d] IE 6 not honoring CSS border-spacing and only cellspacing? how about cellpadding?

There was something I read about border-spacing in CSS being able to adjust the table's border spacing, replacing HTML's attribute cellspacing="0", but then IE 6 won't honor it and it still requires the cellspacing="0" to make it work. However, when the border-collapse: collapse is applied, I foun

Re: [css-d] Font problem with Mac OS 10.5?

On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Brandon Blatcher wrote: > On a website I've built, the font Impact seems to be displaying as > bold. > Yet this is only occurring under Mac OS 10.5. Under 10.4 and Windows > XP, > the font appears fine. I'm not sure if it's a CSS problem, so I'm > posing > the q

Re: [css-d] Font problem with Mac OS 10.5?

On Sep 11, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Brandon Blatcher wrote: > On a website I've built, the font Impact seems to be displaying as > bold. > Yet this is only occurring under Mac OS 10.5. Under 10.4 and Windows > XP, > the font appears fine. I'm not sure if it's a CSS problem, so I'm > posing > the q

[css-d] Font problem with Mac OS 10.5?

Oh, I forget to include the url to the page with the potential font problem in 10.5: http://www.politicalfilter.com/content/frontpage/comments/lipstick-rhetoric/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/

[css-d] Font problem with Mac OS 10.5?

On a website I've built, the font Impact seems to be displaying as bold. Yet this is only occurring under Mac OS 10.5. Under 10.4 and Windows XP, the font appears fine. I'm not sure if it's a CSS problem, so I'm posing the question as a matter of elimination. What say you? _