Re: [css-d] spacing problem in IE

2009-01-29 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
David Laakso wrote: http://www.atlas-inspection.com/privacy.html FWIW, for anyone following this thread-- It is not positioned correctly in XP IE 6/7 (don't know about Vista or Win/200) and Mac Safari (don't know about PC Safari or Chrome). PC Safari: mildly broken at my end - butts into

Re: [css-d] Font size

2009-01-29 Thread David Laakso
Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote: David Thank you. Firefox was not recognizeing the defaults for some reason. I manually reset and both Firefox and IE are the same. Do you know why`Greenwich Mean Time Says ... is in 21 point font. I would like to knock it to 18point.

Re: [css-d] width of scrollable table

2009-01-29 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Jim Albert wrote: It seems like the only way I can get table to be clipped properly and scroll is to give a pixel length to the width of the DIV. I thought I could use: DIV style=width: 100%; overflow: auto; and I was expecting that the table would fill the

Re: [css-d] spacing problem in IE

2009-01-29 Thread Jody Levinson
Thank you for the comments. I've been having trouble aligning the fonts in the header and I haven't been able to figure out how to make it work right. I want the phone numbers to be aligned to the bottom right of the contain they're in, but nothing I do seems to work consistently. I also

[css-d] problem with IE7, suckerfish and flash video

2009-01-29 Thread Chris Kavinsky
I'm running into a real poser and hopefully someone can help me out. I'm building a site using Son of Suckerfish dropdowns for the main navigation. One one page, I have a Flash video imbedded at the top of the content area where the dropdowns overlap. I added wmode=transparent to get the dropdowns

Re: [css-d] width of scrollable table

2009-01-29 Thread Jim Albert
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Jim Albert wrote: It seems like the only way I can get table to be clipped properly and scroll is to give a pixel length to the width of the DIV. I thought I could use: DIV style=width: 100%; overflow: auto; and I was expecting

Re: [css-d] problem with IE7, suckerfish and flash video

2009-01-29 Thread Ingo Chao
2009/1/29 Chris Kavinsky ckavin...@gmail.com ... when I hover over a nav item to activate a dropdown, IE7 hides the video and all content below (everything within the same div from the video to the end). http://associationdatabase.com/aws/ORAEF/pt/sp/prostart_cafe I think this is an IE7

Re: [css-d] Font size

2009-01-29 Thread Hayden's Harness Attachment
David Reduce the font-size on this selector: p.time { font-size: 180%; } Thank you. I missed that. Why is the font-size declared on html,body set at 14% less than default? Probably an error. BTW, Google search is throwing a slew of markup errors. I was trying to comment this out so I

[css-d] Fwd: text positioning

2009-01-29 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
Begin forwarded message: On Thursday 29 January 2009 7:28:51 pm you wrote: On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:14 AM, David McGlone wrote: I've been doing a lot of CSS coding lately and I'm having a slight problem with text positioning. I cannot seem to position any of the words after the first word.

Re: [css-d] text positioning

2009-01-29 Thread Martyn Merrett
Check out http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/index.htm for useful list/nav tips :) ~Mx http://www.mxdx.co.uk 2009/1/30 Martyn Merrett mx.css...@googlemail.com: Would it not be much easier to have a single button as each links background? i.e. ul li class=btna href=foo.phpFoo

Re: [css-d] text positioning

2009-01-29 Thread David Laakso
David McGlone wrote: Hi everyone. I've been doing a lot of CSS coding lately and I'm having a slight problem with text positioning. I cannot seem to position any of the words after the first word. Here's the code I'm using: #text { padding: 0px 0px 10px 5px; position: relative; left:

Re: [css-d] text positioning

2009-01-29 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
David McGlone wrote: I'm thinking that even though there are more than 1 words, closing the tag after each word does not make it a whole new box that can be moved individually. Am I thinking correctly? No, I'm afraid your thinking is flawed for positioning bits of text on top of a fixed