Re: [css-d] nav help

Greg Wilker wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: David Laakso [mailto:da...@chelseacreekstudio.com] >> Subject: Re: [css-d] nav help >> >> Greg Wilker wrote: >> >>> Just to make sure, it looked to me like you didn't change the html - >>> >> true? >> >> False. >> Read what

Re: [css-d] nav help

> -Original Message- > From: David Laakso [mailto:da...@chelseacreekstudio.com] > Subject: Re: [css-d] nav help > > Greg Wilker wrote: > > Just to make sure, it looked to me like you didn't change the html - > true? > > > > False. > Read what I wrote. > Again. okay - thanks again, David

Re: [css-d] nav help

Greg Wilker wrote: >> >>> http://www.gorillasuits.com/HTN/default-css.html >>> >>> >> First things first. Forget the nav for the moment. Is this how the page >> proper is supposed to look? >> html >> >> css >>

Re: [css-d] nav help

> -Original Message- > From: David Laakso [mailto:da...@chelseacreekstudio.com] > Subject: Re: [css-d] nav help > > > > > http://www.gorillasuits.com/HTN/default-css.html > > > > First things first. Forget the nav for the moment. Is this how the page > proper is supposed to look? > html >

Re: [css-d] nav help

Greg Wilker wrote: > Along with the container issue I am having in a previous email, I am also > having trouble with the nav element. > > Does anyone have a good resource that will help me emulate the image that I > posted for reference on this page? > > http://www.gorillasuits.com/HTN/default-css.

Re: [css-d] removing tables

Greg Wilker wrote: > ... I am now having trouble getting the #container to contain the two > med-cat items. > > The border of #container is supposed to wrap everything except the > footer. > > Any help? > > http://www.gorillasuits.com/HTN/default-css.html > -- It's a case of containing your flo

Re: [css-d] nav help

From: Greg Wilker Subject: [css-d] nav help To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 7:19 PM Along with the container issue I am having in a previous email, I am also having trouble with the nav element. Does anyone have a good resource that will help me emulate the im

Re: [css-d] removing tables

On 28/08/2009, at 6:53 AM, Greg Wilker wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: David Hucklesby [mailto:huckle...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Re: [css-d] removing tables >> >> >> Something like this, perhaps? >> >> http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=97480 > > That helped with marg

[css-d] nav help

Along with the container issue I am having in a previous email, I am also having trouble with the nav element. Does anyone have a good resource that will help me emulate the image that I posted for reference on this page? http://www.gorillasuits.com/HTN/default-css.html The blue and red backgr

Re: [css-d] removing tables

> -Original Message- > From: David Hucklesby [mailto:huckle...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: [css-d] removing tables > > > Something like this, perhaps? > > http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=97480 That helped with margins, so the text doesn't wrap under the thumb image - th

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

On 27-Aug-09, at 8:30 AM, Theresa Mesa wrote: > On Aug 27, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Michael Stevens wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org >> [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Bobby Jack >> >> Anything's better than opening links in a n

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

On Aug 27, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Michael Stevens wrote: > -Original Message- > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org > [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Bobby Jack > > Anything's better than opening links in a new window, though :-) > > > > Not much is more

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

On 2009/08/27 11:35 (GMT-0400) Michael Stevens composed: > I'm personally of the opinion that the web page should have some form of > intelligence. Then it should be intelligent enough to know it's not its own computer or browser I am using. I'm the one that gets to decide if a new tab or window

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

I'm personally of the opinion that the web page should have some form of intelligence. I typically design so that if you stay within the domain you stay in the window. If you leave the domain you get a new one so you can more easily return to the domain if you get too deep into the new site. I jus

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

Off-topic a bit, but that's what right-click -> open in new tab (or even better, middle click) is for. Let the user control the tabs/window, rather than the web page. > Not much is more irritating to me than a site that DOES NOT open external > links in a new window or tab. > > Mike > > _

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

-Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Bobby Jack Anything's better than opening links in a new window, though :-) Not much is more irritating to me than a site that DOES NOT open external links in

Re: [css-d] Password Protection

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:19:10AM -0700, Cristiano Diniz da Silva wrote: > Don't count on it. You will need a server-side scripting language and > if you really want some security you will need also a SSL certificate. Not necessarily. You can use HTTP-level authentication by just dropping the ri

Re: [css-d] validating CSS

2009/8/27 jeffrey morin : > I was discussing some CSS techniques the other day and someone brought up a > point of a certain "fix" that I use not validating in the CSS validator. I > have never really been overly concerned with validating my stylesheets as > long as the html was good. Is there a ce

Re: [css-d] external link indicators

--- On Wed, 8/26/09, David Robertson wrote: > > On 27/08/2009, at 9:02 AM, tommy_til...@arwb.uscourts.gov > wrote: > > > > > Can you or has anyone ever used CSS to indicate > > > that a link would take you > > > outside the current web site? Trying to come up > > > with some way to let the > > >

Re: [css-d] request: a thorough going over

David Hucklesby wrote: > FWIW - I work at a computer training lab that has workstations with 19" > monitors, natively running at 1280 x 1024. I have noticed several > students switching to 800 x 600 over the last year. I don't think this > is necessarily age-related, either, as students doing this

Re: [css-d] request: a thorough going over

David Laakso wrote: >>> 6/ Gray on gray is sometimes difficult for some users to read. Have >>> you checked your site with a color contrast analyzer? >> No, I haven't. This is the first I've heard of such a creature. I'll >> look into them. > > > FWIW, here's one... >