On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:09 AM, T. R. Valentine trvalent...@gmail.comwrote:
When using shorthand elements such as 'margin' or 'padding', the order is
(IIRC)
2 values (top bottom) (left right)
4 values (top) (right) (bottom) (left)
What about three values?
Also, does anyone have a
I like the TROUBLE mnemonic = TRBL
cheers,
martin
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:16 PM, jeffrey morin rufus2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:09 AM, T. R. Valentine trvalent...@gmail.comwrote:
When using shorthand elements such as 'margin' or 'padding', the order is
(IIRC)
2
2009/9/28 Martin Möller ceu...@gmail.com:
I like the TROUBLE mnemonic = TRBL
I like it! :-D
Thanks
--
T. R. Valentine
Your friends will argue with you. Your enemies don't care.
'When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left I buy food
and clothes.' -- Erasmus
At 8:09 AM -0500 9/28/09, T. R. Valentine wrote:
When using shorthand elements such as 'margin' or 'padding', the
order is (IIRC)
2 values (top bottom) (left right)
4 values (top) (right) (bottom) (left)
What about three values?
Also, does anyone have a mnemonic to remember the order?
--
On Monday 28 September 2009 09:09:34 am T. R. Valentine wrote:
When using shorthand elements such as 'margin' or 'padding', the order is
(IIRC) 2 values (top bottom) (left right)
4 values (top) (right) (bottom) (left)
What about three values?
Also, does anyone have a mnemonic to
Also, does anyone have a mnemonic to remember the order?
I imagine a clock and I do my clockwise pointing finger technique. :)
First value: Indicator pointing to the 12
Second Value: Indicator pointing to the 3
Third Value: Indicator pointing to the 6
Fourth Value: Indicator pointing to the
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
opinion
I find reading other code (as well as mine later) much
easier if longhand elements are used. After 40+ years of programming
I can say the less cryptic the code, the better it is. This is
because of self-documentation -- in
I agree. I have to write some styles on the fly i.e. div
style=border: 1px soilid red/div and shorthand comes in very
useful. However I only know a few so anyone with a useful to all of
the ones available would be really appreciated.
div style=background: url(img/pic.png) no-repeat top
I have a section of markup on page that under circumstances I want to give the
impression that it is disabled or inactive by making any input controls
contained within it unclickable and the entire area faded out. I figured I'd
do this by placing a css element over the portion of a page with
Also, does anyone have a mnemonic to remember the order?
I remember it by the word TRouBLe (top-right-bottom-left)
---
Tranversal Corporation Ltd will be exhibiting at CIPD Annual conference
exhibition 2009 in
Manchester between 17 - 19 November, stand 510.
Anyone have an idea as to what's going on here?
http://www.williamtobrien.com/airraids.html
http://www.williamtobrien.com/letters_leaving.html
If you view these pages in Safari and Firefox, you'll see what they should
look like. However, the iframes are all wrong in IE. Here's my HTML code for
I'm trying to understand floats and related matters. I have a
question, is the 'containing element' in which an element is floated
either to the left or right - can it be any element, in which the
floated element happens to be nested or wrapped inside of. Or is it
only a block level
I don't have IE6 but have seen in IETester and online renderers that my
horizontal menu
is vertical on IE6.
PLEASE.how can I fix this? I have looked over so many tutorials on
horizontal menus with submenus.
It finally works on modern browsers, but I have the need for it to work on
IE6 as
Ellen Heitman wrote:
Anyone have an idea as to what's going on here?
http://www.williamtobrien.com/airraids.html
http://www.williamtobrien.com/letters_leaving.html
If you view these pages in Safari and Firefox, you'll see what they
should look like. However, the iframes are all wrong in
As far as I can figure out the containing element is always a 'div'
surrounding the floated element or the 'browser window' if there is no
div in the hierarchy above it .
Please do correct me if I have this wrong.
thanks, Naz.
On 28 Sep 2009, at 16:28, MOHAMMED NASEER wrote:
I'm trying to
Jeremy Ferrante wrote:
I have a section of markup on page that under circumstances I want to
give the impression that it is disabled or inactive by making any
input controls contained within it unclickable and the entire area
faded out. I figured I'd do this by placing a css element over the
Ellen Heitman wrote:
Anyone have an idea as to what's going on here?
http://www.williamtobrien.com/airraids.html
http://www.williamtobrien.com/letters_leaving.html
If you view these pages in Safari and Firefox, you'll see what they
should look like. However, the iframes are all wrong in IE.
From: Judy Herilla [mailto:j...@karmoxie.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:10 PM
To: 'css-d@lists.css-discuss.org'
Subject: So close...IE6 horizontal drop-down menu help
I don't have IE6 but have seen in IETester and online renderers that my
horizontal menu
is vertical on IE6.
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.htmlWhile this is the
recommendation, many sites do violate these guidelines, so you can't judge
this rule simply by observing what other sites do. The rules established by
Nielsen are based on user testing, not
Interesting technique unfortunately this doesn't seem to work in IE6/IE7/IE8.
It tid work correctly in Firefox. Downfall to this approach is you cannot give
the overlay
a specific colour.
Any other ideas?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: David Hucklesby [mailto:huckle...@gmail.com]
David Dorward wrote:
2009/9/27 Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi:
Theoretically, you could use selectors like [dir=rtl], but I don’t
think that’s practical. (For one thing, such a selector matches an
element that has the dir property explicitly set to rtl, as
opposite to inherited
As far as I can figure out the containing element is always a 'div'
surrounding the floated element or the 'browser window' if there is no
div in the hierarchy above it .
Please do correct me if I have this wrong.
It's not always a div. It usually is, but it can be any element. Hence
Jeremy Ferrante wrote:
Interesting technique unfortunately this doesn't seem to work in
IE6/IE7/IE8. It tid work correctly in Firefox. Downfall to this
approach is you cannot give the overlay a specific colour.
Any other ideas?
Cheers
-Original Message- From: David Hucklesby
c...@karmoxie.com wrote:
I don't have IE6 but have seen in IETester and online renderers that my
horizontal menu
is vertical on IE6.
Judy
Need a clickable link to the page to give any sound advice.
FWIW:
1/ try display: inline-block;
2/ try setting a width
3/ try
http://mdh-test.com/PV_web/index.shtml
http://mdh-test.com/PV_web/pvg.css
I am trying to do the same thing here...
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/213/213.csspage=0
...with an image fixed in the bottom right corner.
Why is my image not showing up? I've triple-checked the file name.
I've
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is my image not showing up? I've triple-checked the
file name.
http://mdh-test.com/PV_web/cornerart.png gives a 404 - you want to be using
url('images/cornerart.png') in your CSS, not just 'cornerart.png'.
- Bobby
Oh, Lordy. How dumb am I?
On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Bobby Jack wrote:
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is my image not showing up? I've triple-checked the
file name.
http://mdh-test.com/PV_web/cornerart.png gives a 404 - you want to
be using
Judy Herilla wrote:
Thanks, David.
I sent a follow-up email:
http://rugby.karmoxie.com
Judy Herilla
I think Judy intended to send her clickable page link (see above) to the
list...
~d
__
Here is what I have in the head of my document:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8
title- Letters Home:
Ellen Heitman wrote:
Here is what I have in the head of my document:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
David Laakso wrote:
I neglected to provide this link to Tidy:
http://infohound.net/tidy/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
try this
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ellen Heitman ellen.heit...@gmail.comwrote:
Here is what I have in the head of my document:
!DOCTYPE
Another thing to consider is the path from the css file to the images
folder. If your css file is inside a css folder it may not know where to
find the image. If that is the case, you would need to change the url to:
url('../images/cornerart.png').
Russ
- Original Message -
From:
http://mdh-test.com/PV_web/index.shtml
http://mdh-test.com/PV_web/pvg.css
I know, I'm thinking like a print person, but here you go:
I want to take that circuit board image and pull it out about half its
width into the right side, and have the text wrap around the edge
that's left in the
Yeah, that was the problem...I'm a moron, because I know better. :-/
Thanks, though!
Theresa
On Sep 28, 2009, at 8:56 PM, r...@catjuggling.com wrote:
Another thing to consider is the path from the css file to the
images
folder. If your css file is inside a css folder it may not know
Trying to put the entire printed recipe on its own printed page, most
browsers honor my page-break-before: always; declaration. I can't get
this to work nohow no way in Webkit (Safari and Chrome), even by adding
!important...
http://yewebwiz.info/temp/kam/
The rule is first in the @print
Can you mock it up in photoshop and post the image? It would be easier to
envision what you are trying to achieve.
Russ
- Original Message -
From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com
To: css-d Group css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:59 PM
Subject:
I have a section of markup on page that under circumstances I want to give
the
impression that it is disabled or inactive by making any input controls
contained within it unclickable and the entire area faded out. I figured
I'd
do this by placing a css element over the portion of a page with
38 matches
Mail list logo