On 2012/05/21 17:56 (GMT-0400) matt1027 composed:
matt1027 wrote:
I've got a flexible page layout that uses a max width style to keep
it from getting overly wide.
max-width: 980px;
width:expression(document.body.clientWidth> 980? "980px": "auto");
I see now that I need to also have a m
Your constructive comments and suggestions on the sections of this
site [signature link] are always appreciated.
Best,
David Laakso
--
Chelsea Creek Studio
http://ccstudi.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www
At 10:44 PM 5/20/2012, matt1027 wrote:
I've got a flexible page layout that uses a max width style to keep
it from getting overly wide.
max-width: 980px;
width:expression(document.body.clientWidth > 980? "980px": "auto");
I see now that I need to also have a minimum width because it
"breaks i
Am 21.05.2012 22:22 schrieb Jeff Reid:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, J Mi wrote:
Hey All,
Does anyone know how to make the display:block attribute work in
Outlook
2007& 2010 for images? I used inline-style sheets and it doesn't
work.
This may help you some: http://www.campaignmoni
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, J Mi wrote:
> > I have used true inline sheets and Outlook 2010 completely ignores it,
> > resulting in images stacking on each other unless I use or
> > tags.
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:50:20 -0
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, J Mi wrote:
> I have used true inline sheets and Outlook 2010 completely ignores it,
> resulting in images stacking on each other unless I use or
> tags.
>
>> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:50:20 -0400
>> From: tom...@gmail.com
>> To: junk...@live.com
>> CC: css-d@li
I have used true inline sheets and Outlook 2010 completely ignores it,
resulting in images stacking on each other unless I use or tags.
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:50:20 -0400
> From: tom...@gmail.com
> To: junk...@live.com
> CC: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: Re: [css-d] display:blo
On Sun, 20 May 2012, matt1027 wrote:
I've got a flexible page layout that uses a max width style to keep it from
getting overly wide.
max-width: 980px;
Generally, 980px is too narrow.
It also doesn't take into account the viewers size which van vary
over a wide range. For some, 98
Hey W,
Stylesheets are often unreliable in email clients. For many things,
you have to bring the styles inline –
There's a handy guide to various cross-client compatibility over here:
http://htmlemailboilerplate.com/
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarr
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, J Mi wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> Does anyone know how to make the display:block attribute work in Outlook 2007
> & 2010 for images? I used inline-style sheets and it doesn't work.
>
> I also tried declaring it in the CSS stylesheet but it didn't work:
>
>
> /** out
Hey All,
Does anyone know how to make the display:block attribute work in Outlook 2007 &
2010 for images? I used inline-style sheets and it doesn't work.
I also tried declaring it in the CSS stylesheet but it didn't work:
/** outlook adjustment **/
v\:* {
behavior: url(#default#VML);
> By taking David L. suggestion:
>
> About the CSS3 options, if you need to play on the background with both,
> image and gradient, this may work:
>
> I.e - an image on our background, on the bottom left of a given container,
> and a gradient from right to left.
>
> background-color: #f6f6f
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:26 AM, mem wrote:
>
> One approach you might consider for the large yellow-gold shape is to
> set as a foreground image:
> img{display:block;width:100%;height:auto;}
> And superimpose the white text on top of that image.
>
> By thinking on David suggestion I just thought
On May 19, 2012, at 20:30 , David Laakso wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:58 PM, meera kibe wrote:
>
> I want to implement the following:
> A image merged with a background with gradient. Something similar to
> http://www.sittercity.com/au-pair in the "Find available au-pairs".
> I would appre
I see now that I need to also have a minimum width because it "breaks
if it gets too narrow.
What would be the best way to do that? Is there something I can add
to what I'm already using? It works very well across all browsers.
In most cases the following solution will work in all new, an
On May 19, 2012, at 20:30 , David Laakso wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:58 PM, meera kibe wrote:
>
> I want to implement the following:
> A image merged with a background with gradient. Something similar to
> http://www.sittercity.com/au-pair in the "Find available au-pairs".
> I would appre
> Assuming your fluid layout is taking tablets in the mix the images
> need to fold from a full window to 1024 [tablet horizontal] and 768
> [tablet vertical].
> One approach you might consider for the large yellow-gold shape is to
> set as a foreground image:
> img{display:block;width:100%;height:
thanks Tom, will investigate that option
regards
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Livingston"
To: "dave higgs"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] some pages move horizontally
HTML{overflow-y: scroll;} is one possibility
Sent from iOS 5
On May 10, 201
18 matches
Mail list logo
