Le 23 juin 2012 à 04:45, Sandy a écrit :
>
> http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html
>
> http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator
> turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to
> @-moz-keyframes and -moz-animation
> is there a way to get the animations and have the css
Thank you, Teresa! That's an example of just what I'm trying to do.
J
On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Theresa Jennings wrote:
> http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_standard_class.asp
>
> This should help you.
>
>
>
> Theresa Jennings
> Graphic Design & Production • Web Design & Development • I
Thank you, William...I see what I was doing wrong, and thank you for the
confirmation.
John
On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:56 PM, William Gaffga wrote:
> Using classes is correct and h1.two is perfectly legal. If it is not working
> that's because of some coding error on your end.
> put this in your
Using classes is correct and h1.two is perfectly legal. If it is not
working that's because of some coding error on your end.
put this in your css:
h1.two {font-size: 3em; color: #ff6600;text-decoration:overline;}
put this in your code:
This is a big orange heading with a line at the top
--
Willi
I hope I'm (A) using the right term and (B) not asking something really dumb..
I'm in a situation where I could use a variation of my h1 tag, but I don't know
whether that's a legal move, or even the right way to do it.
Assuming it's legal, I've tried h1.two (as opposed to just h1) to get my
va
hey all,
I have been working on figuring out css3 animations and have come up
with a couple of test pages.
http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator
turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to
@-moz-keyframes and -moz-animati
>
> >> I'm taking the body element as the "viewport area" and the wrapper as
> the
> >> "content container area"
> >
> >
> > That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
> > explicit width, but I'd like an unlimited-width repeating background
> image.
> > So gets the backg
On 6/22/12 10:30 AM, Kyle Sessions wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, mem wrote:
I'm taking the body element as the "viewport area" and the wrapper as the
"content container area"
That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
explicit width, but I'd like an unl
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Kyle Sessions wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, mem wrote:
>
>> I'm taking the body element as the "viewport area" and the wrapper as the
>> "content container area"
>
>
> That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
> explicit wi
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, mem wrote:
> I'm taking the body element as the "viewport area" and the wrapper as the
> "content container area"
That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
explicit width, but I'd like an unlimited-width repeating background image.
S
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:34:37 +0300, ochieng' nelson wrote:
| My website users complain that the website (http://kerdowneysafaris.com/)
| does not work well when they view it using ipad. This is especially so
| about on the menu items which they say jump around. Any help in solving
| these problem?
My website users complain that the website (http://kerdowneysafaris.com/)
does not work well when they view it using ipad. This is especially so
about on the menu items which they say jump around. Any help in solving
these problem? Thanks.
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
