My first question for these is always, does this have to be/should be an
actual ?
Second, I think, if I can understand the specs correctly, that Firefox is
actually doing it incorrectly. Without an explicit height (do the specs
mean explicit to be a non-percentage, non-auto value?) on the parent,
>
> I'm using this for my font stack:
>
> font-family: "Trebuchet MS", "TrebuchetMS","Trebuchet", "Lucida
> Grande", "Lucida Sans Unicode", "Lucida Sans", Tahoma, Helvetica,
> Arial, sans-serif;
>
> The three Trebuchets listed was attempt to solve my issue, which is
> that although I see Trebuchet
List,
I'm using this for my font stack:
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", "TrebuchetMS","Trebuchet", "Lucida
Grande", "Lucida Sans Unicode", "Lucida Sans", Tahoma, Helvetica,
Arial, sans-serif;
The three Trebuchets listed was attempt to solve my issue, which is
that although I see Trebuchet in my sys
Would really appreciate a suggestion and explanation from this group.
I'd like to align a link at the bottom of a table cell. The rest of the text
should be aligned at the top of the cell. I'd also like to leave some padding
above the link so that I can reduce the width of the window and there's
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Philip Taylor wrote:
>>> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404?
>
> Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he
> seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters
>
> Translation : the suits and bean-counters have t
Philip Taylor wrote:
> Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he
> seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters
>
> Translation : the suits and bean-counters have threatened litigation for
> infringement of copyright.
A variant can still be found he
Theresa Jennings wrote:
> Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread.
> Oh, well. It was cool.
>
>
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote:
>
>> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404?
Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from
http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404?
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of COM
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:08 AM
To: CSS-Discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
..it also just
Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. Oh,
well. It was cool.
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote:
> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404?
>
__
css-discuss [css-d@li
..it also just dawned on me that illustration converted to code can be
dynamically changed…
some dizzying implications to that, eh?
John
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/cs
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold wrote:
> It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to
> export something like this, but I lean toward "probably not." More
> likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that
> illustrations will export to . Illu
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:15 AM, MiB wrote:
>
> nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings:
>
>> I think they're more proof of concept than anything else.
>
> Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there
> first.
It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an op
Le 13 nov. 2013 à 22:44, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
a écrit :
> many such breakpoints (out there in practice) are defined in ems, even when
> the author is thinking pixels, where one EM is calculated as 16 pixels.
>
> /* for 600px ...(16 * 37.5 == 600) */
> @media all and (min-width: 37.5e
many such breakpoints (out there in practice) are defined in ems, even when
the author is thinking pixels, where one EM is calculated as 16 pixels.
/* for 600px ...(16 * 37.5 == 600) */
@media all and (min-width: 37.5em) {
...css goes here
}
I've been doing this because the examples I c
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:26 AM, william drescher
wrote:
> I looked and googled but... what is a css breakpoint?
> Is it just setting width ?
>
> bill
>
Breakpoints are points at which certain CSS rules kick in. They are
most commonly based on the width of your browser viewport but can also
be
...
Fluid/flexible layouts are, IMO, best. Like you mention, new devices
are coming out all the time. Percentage width on your structure help
you cover all the varying widths. Start mobile first, and adjust
layout with breakpoints when the *content* requires it. Sometimes a
single column is all y
16 matches
Mail list logo