Re: [css-d] Do modern mobile browsers deliberately ignore font size?

2014-03-10 Thread Tom Livingston
http://www.quirksmode.org/mobile/metaviewport/ This has a good explanation of what it's for. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 9, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings to all, I can't figure out why a webpage as simple as [2] renders text with uniform size

[css-d] Browser hacks

2014-03-10 Thread Chris Rockwell
Has JS hacks as well, but it's a nice reference of all the hacks that are out there: http://browserhacks.com/ -- Chris Rockwell __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List

Re: [css-d] child width exceeding parents' ?!

2014-03-10 Thread Tim Arnold
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Georg ge...@gunlaug.com wrote: Den 10.03.2014 00:32, skrev Philippe Wittenbergh: The box model John. Adding the padding makes the box wider. Same thing with the border. The 1px border on that image makes it 2px wider and taller than 100%. If you really need

Re: [css-d] child width exceeding parents' ?!

2014-03-10 Thread Greg Gamble
Looks like the H4 header is styled, not the container, which is getting a width of 998px. 980px width + 16px from padding + 2px from border? Greg -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of John Sent:

Re: [css-d] child width exceeding parents' ?!

2014-03-10 Thread Eric
Just to be the contrarian that my family and friends often say I am...Let me add this to the thread: It's been a long while since I've even thought about the convoluted math that needs to be done when using the counter-intuitive W3C box model. These days I just add this to the top of all my

Re: [css-d] Do modern mobile browsers deliberately ignore font size?

2014-03-10 Thread Ezequiel Garzón
http://www.quirksmode.org/mobile/metaviewport/ This has a good explanation of what it's for. Thanks, Tom. Still, the word font cannot be found in that article, and I again feel font size in particular is not supposed to be affected by this meta tag. Besides, I'm still puzzled by the way modern

Re: [css-d] Do modern mobile browsers deliberately ignore font size?

2014-03-10 Thread Tom Livingston
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.quirksmode.org/mobile/metaviewport/ This has a good explanation of what it's for. Thanks, Tom. Still, the word font cannot be found in that article, and I again feel font size in particular is not

Re: [css-d] Do modern mobile browsers deliberately ignore font size?

2014-03-10 Thread MiB
mar 10 2014 21:54 Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com: I again feel font size in particular is not supposed to be affected by this meta tag Feel? Incongruent with something (what?) would seem more appropriate. Case in point?