On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:07 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:04 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:01 AM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think percentages are based on their parents size and
apr 9 2014 08:48 Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com:
Looks like there are some exceptions. Have a look see...
There ARE a few that took on the browser width, but the majority stuck with
their parent.
http://designdrumm.com/percentage_test.html
Which are the exceptions you mean?
Le 9 avr. 2014 à 15:48, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com a écrit :
Looks like there are some exceptions. Have a look see...
There ARE a few that took on the browser width, but the majority stuck with
their parent.
http://designdrumm.com/percentage_test.html
1. An element that is
Here is something for the day
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-qeaPTdWSgXo/UVVuFe80bvI/U1o/D0zkQ_7XZBw/w640-h480-no/Q3cUg29.gif.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-qeaPTdWSgXo/UVVuFe80bvI/U1o/D0zkQ_7XZBw/w640-h480-no/Q3cUg29.gif
Howdy Crest,
~~~
Tuesday, April 8, 2014, 9:24:14 PM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
Em are the best solution for font-sizes, from everything that I know.
Pixels I don't know
Currently, my website (Freelance Traveller,
http://www.freelancetraveller.com) has slightly messy CSS to give the
following appearance (view fixed font):
++
|Header |
++---+
|Nav |Content|
|Menu| |
||
On 9 April 2014 16:00, Freelance Traveller edi...@freelancetraveller.comwrote:
First, is display: table-cell a viable solution for the layout issue?
caniuse suggests that if I don't feel a need to support IE7 or earlier,
I should be OK, but caniuse doesn't always tell the whole story.
The
How did you calculate 100% = 1em ?
Mostly everyone used, including myself pixels for box sizing, I hope you
were referring to creating a DIV as in box sizing ? What do you mean by
percentages are based on browser size ?
(although, it would be kind of fun if 100% resulted in letters
hundreds
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Tim Climis tim.cli...@gmail.com wrote:
How did you calculate 100% = 1em ?
Mostly everyone used, including myself pixels for box sizing, I hope you
were referring to creating a DIV as in box sizing ? What do you mean by
percentages are based on browser size ?
How did you calculate 100% = 1em ?
That's the definition in the spec. On the 'font-size' property, [ems]
refer to the computed font size of the parent element.
So 1em equals the font-size of the parent element.
And [percentages] refer to inherited font-size. The inherited font size
of an
On 4/9/14, 8:12 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
On 9 April 2014 16:00, Freelance Traveller edi...@freelancetraveller.comwrote:
First, is display: table-cell a viable solution for the layout issue?
caniuse suggests that if I don't feel a need to support IE7 or earlier,
I should be OK, but caniuse
If you use rem's it stays consistent from the body tag... correct?
Shari
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Shari webweave...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use rem's it stays consistent from the body tag... correct?
Correct. It is relative to the root.
Shari
__
css-discuss
Den 09.04.2014 17:00, skrev GJim:
I have found an issue with Opera (v12.16 is installed) when using 'small' vs %.
Note that Opera v/12.16 uses the old Presto engine, for which all
development is frosen/ended. A good browser, but no good designing
for/in it anymore.
Download Opera 20+ that
GJim wrote:
according to site stats, I have visitors still using IE3!
I /think/ I would check whether my site statistics had been
updated this millenium, if I were you ...
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
Howdy Georg,
~~~
Wednesday, April 9, 2014, 1:09:22 PM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
Note that Opera v/12.16 uses the old Presto engine, for which all
development is
Not not correct - The value of a REM is taken from the font-size of the root
element...thus the HTML element, not the BODY element.
On April 9, 2014 at 12:05 PM Shari webweave...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use rem's it stays consistent from the body tag... correct?
Shari
Opps, forgot to add this:
Yes, if you use REM the value will stay consistent with the value of font-size
set on root element. If you use a percentage for the root element's font-size
your other font-sizes will vary depending on the browser's default font size
setting...Some have no problem with
Howdy Philip,
~~~
Wednesday, April 9, 2014, 1:37:54 PM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
I /think/ I would check whether my site statistics had been
updated this millenium, if I
I thought Opera went to webkit, or is Blink just another term for webkit ?
Georg wrote:
Den 09.04.2014 17:00, skrev GJim:
I have found an issue with Opera (v12.16 is installed) when using
'small' vs %.
Note that Opera v/12.16 uses the old Presto engine, for which all
development is
On 2014-04-09 20:33 (GMT-0400) Crest Christopher composed:
I thought Opera went to webkit, or is Blink just another term for webkit ?
WebKit is a fork of KHTML. Blink is a fork of WebKit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_%28software_development%29
--
The wise are known for their
Den 10.04.2014 02:33, skrev Crest Christopher:
I thought Opera went to webkit, or is Blink just another term for webkit ?
WebKit is a branch of the KDE open source project, and so is Blink.
Google and Opera decided not all that long ago to split from WebKit, and
called their engine-version
22 matches
Mail list logo
