Hi all,
Take a look at my example: http://jsfiddle.net/nn2N7/
In summary I have 2 siblings, one with 100px height and another with 100%. I
was expecting the 100% div to only fill the available space after subtracting
the 100px. Instead it assumes 100% height of parent block level element
Le 1 juil. 2014 à 20:57, Lixo Aqui lixoa...@netcabo.pt a écrit :
Take a look at my example: http://jsfiddle.net/nn2N7/
In summary I have 2 siblings, one with 100px height and another with 100%. I
was expecting the 100% div to only fill the available space after subtracting
the 100px.
Thanks for the clarification.
I'm just learning about the flex box module, do you think you can provide an
example of a solution using flexbox?
Because my fix only works if my first sibling has a fixed height which is not
always the case so what I want is 1 children to take as much height as
Maybe if I ask this question a different way, I can figure out an answer.
Normally when I create a table I apply no CSS to it and it just does
the right thing, e.g.:
http://jsfiddle.net/u6ULk/
But I want the table to be scrollable with a fixed header, so I do this:
http://jsfiddle.net/mrLVG/
Is it possible to have a scrolling table with fixed headers without
explicitly specifying the table cell sizes?
Depending on your content this may be (or outright is) semantically
horrifying, but you could achieve the *visual look* you want by using
CSS display:table, et al and/or dl,dt,dd
Le 1 juil. 2014 à 23:40, Lixo Aqui lixoa...@netcabo.pt a écrit :
I'm just learning about the flex box module, do you think you can provide an
example of a solution using flexbox?
Because my fix only works if my first sibling has a fixed height which is not
always the case so what I want
