jul 26 2014 01:24 Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com:
I usually go px on the body and % everywhere else.
Why does px on body seems like a good idea for users?
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
I am trying a better way to style and position elements at:
http://www.coffeeonmars.com/170_su/template/home.html
I’m the one who used an h1 and was seeing ems render larger because of that. so
I tried changing that h1 to just a regular div but instead of respecting the
specified width of
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
I am trying a better way to style and position elements at:
http://www.coffeeonmars.com/170_su/template/home.html
I’m the one who used an h1 and was seeing ems render larger because of that.
so I tried changing that h1 to
You also have 2 containers with the same ID of #main_header. The
header and a child div. That's a no no.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
I am trying a better way to style and position
On Jul 26, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
You also have 2 containers with the same ID of #main_header. The
header and a child div. That's a no no.
ya just saw that after posting…jeepers what a dumb mistake..
ugh..thank you for spotting that, Tom
John
Sent from losPhone
On Jul 26, 2014, at 8:34 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
jul 26 2014 01:24 Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com:
I usually go px on the body and % everywhere else.
Why does px on body seems like a good idea for users?
It's actually a method I learned
On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Sent from losPhone
On Jul 26, 2014, at 8:34 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
jul 26 2014 01:24 Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com javascript:;
:
I usually go px on the body and %
Sent from losPhone
On Jul 26, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Sent from losPhone
On Jul 26, 2014, at 8:34 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
jul 26 2014 01:24
On 2014-07-26 18:29 (GMT-0400) Karl DeSaulniers composed:
I usually go px on the body and % everywhere else.
Why does px on body seems like a good idea for users?
It's actually a method I learned online...
As is often the case where a page is trying to make it easy for stylists,
which
Sent from losPhone
On Jul 26, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2014-07-26 18:29 (GMT-0400) Karl DeSaulniers composed:
I usually go px on the body and % everywhere else.
Why does px on body seems like a good idea for users?
It's actually a method I
On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Sent from losPhone
On Jul 26, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net
javascript:; wrote:
On 2014-07-26 18:29 (GMT-0400) Karl DeSaulniers composed:
I usually go px on the body and % everywhere
On 2014-07-26 19:43 (GMT-0500) Karl DeSaulniers composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
...CSS for the public web should never size text in px. Sizing text in
px means the optimal base size determined by each user, as embodied in
his browser default size, is totally disregarded, tyrannically usurped
if
Felix, admittedly I never questioned why setting font-size: 100% was a best
practice, it's just always something I've done. Based on your response I
did some quick research and, it appears, the original reason was to fix
some ie6/7 issues with em scaling.
Additionally, I checked normalize.CSS as
Nevermind, its not in normalize.CSS, I scanned too quickly - sorry!
On Jul 26, 2014 9:40 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
Felix, admittedly I never questioned why setting font-size: 100% was a
best practice, it's just always something I've done. Based on your response
I did
On 2014-07-26 21:40 (GMT-0400) Chris Rockwell composed:
... the original reason was to fix
some ie6/7 issues with em scaling.
Hence my language in compliant browsers. :-)
Without looking further, there appear to be valid reasons for setting
font-size to 100% on body.
I can't think of any
15 matches
Mail list logo
