Re: [css-d] Cascade Image override ?

Have you checked inspect element to see how the browser is handling it? That is the first place I would check and test. Also, are you sure you're clearing the cache on you browser before viewing edits? I have had this cause issues on edits before. The edits were there, but I saw a cache file. So

Re: [css-d] rendering of icon in Windows browsers

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Sara Haradhvala wrote: > > I think you’re right. The problem is that I need to use a glyph from > photoshop that isn’t assigned a unicode value. Is there any way to use this > as text? Or does it have to be turned into an svg image? That would solve you probl

Re: [css-d] Cascade Image override ?

I don't see how the method I'm using shouldn't work. > Tom Livingston > Wednesday, July 27, 2016 4:02 PM > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Crest Christopher < > > > I just used this in a test: > > @media screen and (min-width: 480px){ > .test{ > position: relative; > bac

Re: [css-d] rendering of icon in Windows browsers

Hi Sara, I think you're meaning this? No it does not have to be a svg. .menu li::after { font-family: 'athelas', serif; font-weight:bold; font-size: 16px; content: url('diamond.png'); } Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jul 27, 20

Re: [css-d] rendering of icon in Windows browsers

I think you’re right. The problem is that I need to use a glyph from photoshop that isn’t assigned a unicode value. Is there any way to use this as text? Or does it have to be turned into an svg image? > On Jul 27, 2016, at 7:15 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > >> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:

Re: [css-d] rendering of icon in Windows browsers

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:05 AM, Sara Haradhvala wrote: > > I set up this unicode in CSS > > .menu li::after { > content: “◆”; > font-family: athelas, serif; > font-weight:bold; > font-size: 16px; > } > > My problem is that the diamond is much bigger in IE and somewhat bi

Re: [css-d] rendering of icon in Windows browsers

Hi Sara, What does your @font look like? Does athelas not have quotes around it? I have found that simply adding '' (single quote) in the @font and font-family helps on IE and FF when using custom fonts. .menu li::after { font-family: 'athelas', serif; font-weight:bold; fo

[css-d] rendering of icon in Windows browsers

I set up this unicode in CSS .menu li::after { content: “◆”; font-family: athelas, serif; font-weight:bold; font-size: 16px; } My problem is that the diamond is much bigger in IE and somewhat bigger in FF on Windows. All looks good on Mac browsers and Chrome on Wi

Re: [css-d] Cascade Image override ?

Tom Livingston wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Crest Christopher < > crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't a rule further down the cascading >> over ride any previous rules before ? >> >> 1st. >> #inner { >> position:relative; >> >> >

Re: [css-d] Cascade Image override ?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Crest Christopher < crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't a rule further down the cascading > over ride any previous rules before ? > > 1st. > #inner { > position:relative; > > > background-image:url("/wdp/wip/images/l2b

Re: [css-d] Cascade Image override ?

Link? On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Crest Christopher < crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't a rule further down the cascading > over ride any previous rules before ? > > 1st. > #inner { > position:relative; > > > background-image:url("/wdp/wip/ima

[css-d] Cascade Image override ?

Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't a rule further down the cascading over ride any previous rules before ? 1st. #inner { position:relative; background-image:url("/wdp/wip/images/l2b_innertop.png"),url("/wdp/wip/images/l2b_innerfooter.jpg"),url("/wdp/wip/background-paper.jpg");

Re: [css-d] default border property?

On 7/22/2016 8:38 PM, John J wrote: Can anyone shed light on the concept of the setting of default border properties? I may be suffering the effects of this on some elements which ought to be following the same css, but which seem not to be; differing border code might be the reason. Thank you!