Re: [css-d] Problems with elastic layout

2006-08-08 Thread Adam McGrath
Hi Dave, Using an elastic layout and allowing users to change font size is good, so I'd say you're on the right track, just a couple of things from glancing at your page though: 1) Your background image needs to repeat along the x axis (and can be a lot thinner) background: #fff url(/images/bg.g

Re: [css-d] having layout and relative positioning [WAS Re: Peekaboo Too?]

2006-04-21 Thread Adam McGrath
woops... my bad... should have said give element layout OR use position: relative - thanks for pointing that out zoe best adam On 4/21/06, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bryce Fields wrote: > > On 4/21/06, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [css-d] Peekaboo Too?

2006-04-19 Thread Adam McGrath
Hi Bruce, the only other quick fix i could recomend is to try forcing the parent element #content, to "have layout", (eg position: relative;), that usually fixes a multitude of peekaboo weirdness's cheers ad On having layout article: http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html On 4/19/

Re: [css-d] IE6 Cache Bug?

2006-03-30 Thread Adam McGrath
sounds alot like the ie6 peek-a-boo bug: http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/peekaboo.html got a url? cheers ad On 3/30/06, Spike Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > When I click the back button to return to one (and only one) page on a > site I'm building, all of the cont

Re: [css-d] when is css width applicable?

2006-03-06 Thread Adam McGrath
Yep the width element can be used on block-level and replaced elements (eg HTML, IMG, INPUT, TEXTAREA, SELECT, and OBJECT element) from: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/conform.html Replaced element An element for which the CSS formatter knows only the intrinsic dimensions. In HTML, IMG, INPUT,