w.wyomerc.com/bookboxes/bookboxes.html
> Book repairs: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookrepair/bookrepairs.html
> My photography: http://www.gjim.com
>
> Savvy ponderable:
> Most folks are just about as happy as they've made up their mind to be.
>
>
>
> --
ystem, heading for a high
speed crash? Or do I misunderstand how this works?
If so--if a technology change is indeed looming--will CSS be part of the
ultimate solution?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-dis
http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss
rg/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
ss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
_
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org
rowser, depending on current
viewport width.
is this possible with CSS only?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
_
css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists
://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@li
it's obvious. Sometimes it is not.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss
1_10001_-1
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http:/
[css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pi
scuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh &g
gston wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
> wrote:
> > I'm a beginner at responsive design. I understand the mobile first
> > argument which (at least from the client side) boils down to "Design for
> > the phone first and then u
is the goal.
Does anybody want to argue against that big picture view? Or amend it
some, for the benefit of a beginner?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.cs
; Micky
>
> --
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/p
you build from the
desktop down, or from the cell phone up?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://cs
.
But I'm clueless about cell phone CSS strategies. I learn quickly.
*What are some good online "responsive design" resources? * (my first
attempts to find good resources yielded poorly-written jargon)
--
/* Colin (S
pported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
> ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
>
I've been a fan of Romanato site for a long time.
Imagination ideas and ambition trump staid perfection any day.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0>
Have code will travel */
__
css-dis
vascript and the DOM tree (which used to be a
browser-sniffing nightmare, the last time I tried it). Are there any
alternate strategies I'm not aware of.simply because I'm an amateur
hacker and not a well-educated professional?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >
on
the keyboard rather than a holding hand.
Continued support for IE6 is counterproductive--a bad strategy for the
community at large.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0>
Have code will travel */
(and then have the sub-menus pop up left or right rather than below). And
then you can add new top-level menu items--more or less forever-without
running out of screen real estate.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0>
Have
to smart phones?
Corollary: is it true that fixed-width layouts (perhaps a centered 780 pixel
wide wrapper division) are the least portable across
various devices?
...thank you
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0>
{
width: 333px;
height: 250px;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
#showdiv img { max-width: 333px; max-height: 250px;}
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0>
montana-riverboa
tance, mean Google Sketchup would
no longer be a windows binary download. You could run it any HTML5 browser.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-
nd? And if so,
it it an HTML error or a CSS error. I tried to look this up W3.org, but I'm
going to have to work on those grammar-like specifications. They are not
easy for beginners to read.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pitt
mes N-resolutions times N-browsers.
What is the professional debugging way proceed?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Li
hadow : #22 1px 1px 0
}
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List polic
s
pin off my nose and KVM back to Linux or Mac. Sorry for passing bad
information
on a holiday.
:-((
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailm
text-shadow doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in
: #ff 1px 1px 0 #ff 1px 1px 0 #ff 1px 1px 0 #ff 1px 1px 0
I'm not sure what the issues are here.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
e center
column only).
Any examples out there anybody can point me to?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List w
The holy grail is that place we'll all be to (soon, I think)
when we can finally stop worrying, thinking about and dealing
with IEsicks.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-
Quirks mode?
Interesting.
Maybe.
The code validates at w3c validator without errors.
Each page begins with:
Robopages...
http://robopages.sourceforge.net/dirLCSS.css>"
type="text/css">
etc
--
/* Colin (Sandy
order: 3px inset #cc; }
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Li
l and
traditional
ways to make the same displays. If your pages are invisible to Google,
then they are essentially invisible to everyone.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discus
upport_evolt/
I believe it to be an issue commonly referred to as a "float drop". There is
no magic bullet; only best practice solutions. Position is Everything has a
full explanation.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/expandingboxbug.html
Best,
-colin
__
I'm sure my problem is ridiculously simple but it's driving me mad.
Firefox tells me my link is
div#contenu>liste-article>ul .somm-titre>li>h3.titre>a
What is the syntax for setting the color of the link.
i've tried
a.h3.somm-titre{
color: #eef;
}
a.somm-titre{
color: #eef;
}
a.h3.titre{
col
On Jan 14, 2008 9:09 PM, L. David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to configure the server to send CSS files as text/css.
Fixed, thanks.
I will henceforth pay more attention to the error console.
--
Colin Brace
Amsterdam
http
Can one of you try opening <http://lim.nl/index.html> to see what
happens? If the background is dark and the text and image are
centered, then the style file was loaded; otherwise I really do have a
problem.
Thanks.
--
Colin Brace
Amsterdam
Susanne Jäger wrote:
> Colin Mcgarry wrote, On 10.11.2007 17:28:
>
>
>> The reason for browser searching is to accommodate browser quirks in the
>> CSS.
>>
>
> Well user agent sniffing is IMHO (one of) the most fragile method(s) of
> doing that. You
nd the problem.
The reason for browser searching is to accommodate browser quirks in the
CSS.
Colin Mcgarry wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
> The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
>
> Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees i
David Hucklesby wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:14:52 +0100, Colin Mcgarry wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the replies.
>> The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
>>
>> Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Ope
Thanks for the replies.
The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees it as a
blank page.
David Hucklesby wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:11:36 +0100, Colin Mcgarry wrote:
>
>> I've jus
I've just set up Opera to see how it deals with my web pages. I was
surprised to see my home page has no css with Opera.
the page is http://www.cpmac.comand the css is a php file that begins
= 5) { ?>
/* BEGIN CSS RENDERING */
followed by css styles
Firefox and even IE7 treat it
Looking at the css of a website I was visiting i noticed the following
page layout.
#page {
position: absolute;
width: 994px;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -497px;
}
I can follow the logic of this but is it better than
left 0
margin 0
__
Thanks Georg,
I thought I was nuts for a while. I was able to line things up in
photoshop, and everything looked normal.
I presume the png compression utility I used mucked things up, but it could
very well be me.
Very much appreciated...cheers!
Colin
Colin wrote:
> In ff1.5/win for some rea
.
Thanks in advance,
Colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported
On 3/28/06, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Colin Sheaff wrote:
> I'm sure I could suss this out with enough hours of research and
> trial-and-error tweaking of the site, but I would love to resolve this
quicker
> so I ask for your he
francky wrote:
> Brian Funk wrote:
>
>
>
>> Keith Kaiser wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> OK! It's done.
>>> help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
>>>
>>> http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
>>>
>>>
>>
>> on WinXP IE6:
>>
>> .
>
>
> 5.
> In general, be carefull with colored w
E 6.0 will highlight in reverse to the begining of the page. This
doesn't happen in Firefox 1.501, or Safari 1.3.2. This actually happens on all
the pages on the site. I have a feeling it's an issue with relative
positioning.
Thanks for the help,
Colin
[
Sarangan Thuraisingham wrote:
> Colin McGarry wrote:
>
>> Hello
>> I'm trying to adapt a script I found for roll down menus in css.
>> My adaptation works except the rolldown menus displace the text of
>> the div just below.
>> In the original they cove
Hello
I'm trying to adapt a script I found for roll down menus in css.
My adaptation works except the rolldown menus displace the text of the
div just below.
In the original they cover the text. I can't see what I've changed to
make the comportment change.
The base script is at http://www.cpmac
Hello
I'm no expert on css but it seems to me that one can't put
postion:absolute on contained items.
They postion themselves relative to the window.
cpmac
Thomas Hall wrote:
>Please look at this layout -
>http://webhost.bridgew.edu/etribou/layouts/3col_footer/archives/3col_footer_
>02
>
>
>
Thomas Hall wrote:
>Please look at this layout -
>http://webhost.bridgew.edu/etribou/layouts/3col_footer/archives/3col_footer_
>02
>
>
>
>This is about what I am after except I'd like to be able to absolutely
>position elements inside the header, footer, and columns. It seems that when
>I attem
av_bg.gif) repeat-x top left;
}
#mainmenu li.on li a {
background:transparent;
}
/* Rollover */
#mainmenu li:hover ul, li.over ul {
display: block;
}
Any insight would be very much appreciated on this. Thanks in advance,
Colin
__
css-di
I've created two css files for the page linked below. One is for screen and
the other (that eliminates navigation, banner and background) is for
printing. The problem I'm having is that while the banner, background and
navigation are being hidden properly when viewing print preview, a shadow of
the
(underneath) what I'd like to strive for with .
The reason I'd like to keep the 's so high is I'd like to 'heighten
them' on a:hover.
I believe I've read about this before, and I think someone's response to
'semi-clickable lin
I have a site that has a repeating background y only. And i want it
to adjust to the screen. got that to work but it seems like i need a
minimum requirements because when i resize the window so the content
is lager than 100% of the screen it cuts off the background that
being repeated.
ht
I have a site that has a repeating background y only. And i want it
to adjust to the screen. got that to work but it seems like i need a
minimum requirements because when i resize the window so the content
is lager than 100% of the screen it cuts off the background that
being repeated.
I am trying to make a footer that is automatically adjusting, i think
because i created a background image to repeat inside a div tag that
has height of 100% then, the website isn't allowing the footer image
to show because on some browsers it is cutting it off. Is that the
right assumptio
eal' read, as I just
brushed through them last night.
Thanks again,
Colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
ded a border to determine the height of #main.
The strangest thing happens, div#main loses all of its height.
I presume the problem cascades from somewhere above #main, but I just can't
see it.
Thanks so much for your help.
BTW
hat height any particular page will be. (and this
image is supposed to stick to the bottom)
If anyone has any ideas, it looks like I'll be up for quite some time
tonight.
BTW, it does validate.
<http://dreampowercostumes.com/travel>
Thanks
Colin
__
Weird thing. On internet explorer and Foxfire this looks a ok but if
you load it on safari it doesn't seem to load the page correctly it
seems to merge the webpage you are on with the new page, and if you
hit refresh then it still gets all messed up. Could somebody please
shed a little ligh
Hi this is just a general question i would like to be updated on.
I always thought you were supposed to put position in your Div Ids
and stuff? but on the pages no one seems to be putting them at all.
if it not there is there a default the tags becomes?
Also, I always thought there was a ie
I been seeing this tag but i don't understand what it means could
someone explain it in detail to me please thank you.
html>body #content {
width: 46%; /* ie5win fudge ends */
}
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://w
I have been trying to use the SantaKlauss "Pure CSS Tooltips" - found at;
http://web.archive.org/web/20040211063731/http://www.madaboutstyle.com/tooltip2.html
I have tried - as the article suggests - to put the print code into a separate
linked stylesheet. As soon as I take this code; "div#main{m
>If anyone has any ideas on how to go about fixing this, I'm all ears.
Note to self...quit listening to the monitor.
Thanks everyone for your help.
Cheers,
Colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-dis
he problem is in trying to horizontally center the #main div using
"margin: 0 auto;" and for some reason it is getting offset to the left of
center.
I've drawn a red border around the problem spot.
If anyone has any ideas on how to go about fixing this, I'm
Hi,
Can someone explain the huge amount of extra space that IE6 is putting in this
page...
http://colinmac.port5.com/bluegreybox1-1/bluegreybox/index.html
It looks fine in Firefox and Opera, and I don't want to break *them* to fix IE,
but I need it to work in IE.
TIA
72 matches
Mail list logo
