You could have the a be display: block; and add padding//bg color
etc. to achieve the look you are after. Remove the hover from the
li.
Or a as inline-block instead of block.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
padding//bg color
etc. to achieve the look you are after. Remove the hover from the
li.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
help.
--
Hope this helps.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Brian Jones bdotjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have this demo setup here http://jsfiddle.net/dTsrY/ and i need help
with a few issues that i am having.
I am using bootstrap 3.0 and when
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't explain what you mean with same size -- in a valid HTML5
document I wouldn't get that issue you claim -- nor do you post online code
as HTML/CSS. It's pointless to debate what you
http://www.quirksmode.org/mobile/metaviewport/
This has a good explanation of what it's for.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings to all,
I can't figure out why a webpage as simple as [2] renders text with
uniform size
-size-adjust: 100%;
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
again just
for hack management.
I have to agree. It's been the least problematic solution i've tried.
I'm not sure what modern browsers have implemented to lessen it's use,
but in my case where I have to worry about browsers as far back as IE7
still, this works best.
--
Tom Livingston
;}
.clear:after {clear:both;}
.clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */
While these definitions are using real in-the-spec css, they are
taking advantage of browser behaviors to cause a wrapper element to
contain floated elements within it.
Smarter people, feel free to correct me...
HTH
--
Tom
://www.samuelrossille.com/css-shape/
or
http://html-generator.weebly.com/css-shape-generator.html
complex shapes can be made by stacking same-colored simple shapes,
which is how the Simpsons ones were done.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:40 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On 3/6/14 12:37 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
You may be better off with SVG (or gif/png) for compatibility's sake,
ah..ok, that I can do. If I go with .svg, who gets frozen out? IE?
Looks like IE8 and below
http://caniuse.com
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Davies, Elizabeth
elizabeth_dav...@gallup.com wrote:
On the bright side, it's all getting gutted and nothing is sacred. It will be
a fun year.
You get a whole year?!? Lucky!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:32 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
in the case where you have section float left and aside float left, footer
clear both, is clear a hack?
In this case, no. Clear is in the spec.
…or is it part of CSS deliberately to handle such a
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Nancy Johnson njohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a standard method to use media queries?
I took the W3C mobile course about 3 years ago and since then there
are many more devices out there each with different size and/or
retinal
Firefox here: http://apsona.com/share/Selection_017.png
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
Sridhar
__
Adding overflow: hidden; to .main-menu-sub (to clear floating lis)
and width: 100%; fixed it here in FF 27.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
-container
2) 'underlapping' the bottom of the page content a bit so some of the color
shows behind the content.
Hi Debbie,
Having a little trouble understanding what you're after. Do you have a
link to an image of the effect you are typing to achieve that we can
see?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
. This will prevent the
top of the image from getting cropped by footer-wrapper and you may
get more of the image peeking up behind your content.
Just a thought. HTH.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
it off-list.
Thanks for your time, and my apologies to list-mom for borderline
subject matter.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
the “Home” nav elements would be visible on all other pages.
Thank you,
John
Normally, I just class a main wrapper (consistent on all pages) or the
body element and attack it that way...
.homepage nav a.home{display:none; visibility: none;}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media
is better? I don't technically know.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
usually still
display the link (text) but not as a working link (I assume the reason is
simply to prevent an unnecessary page load).
Agreed. I've done this as well. On home page, home link is highlighted
as the active page and isn't clickable.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer
to be that long.
Possible to do this?
thank you!
John\
How about min-width?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
lidiv class=lengtha href=#The Rain in Spain stays Mainly in the
Plain/a/div/li
/ul
-
Rod Castello
Going this route, could you not just apply the width to the lis and
avoid the extra element?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
-decoration:none;
border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(0,0,0);
}
--
Cordially,
David
Ha ha. As always, I can't see the forest for the trees. Such a simple
solution David... :-/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2014-01-31 20:07, Tom Livingston wrote:
[...]
ul a{
display: block; /* - Add this */
[...]
Ha ha. As always, I can't see the forest for the trees. Such a simple
solution David... :-/
But to a problem
=circle1 /div/div
/div
I would guess SVG might be better, but I am not familiar with it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss
/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2014, at 1:45 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 23 janv. 2014 à 03:34, Ed Pybus e...@slrecords.net a écrit :
've encounter an odd problem with display:inline-block. When I have the
website on a USB stick and open it in IE11 it opens as
correctly. Variations of the
equation i've tried aren't working.
What am I not grasping?
Thanks for your time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
If I understand it correctly, it's working the way you want - maybe there's
something else involved? http://codepen.io/anon/pen/hypoH
OK, thanks Chris. I'll start looking for other culprits.
--
Tom Livingston
there are other styles from somewhere else effecting
the pages? Also, to be clear, are you viewing in the same browser in
both cases?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
: 4px solid #99;
height: 120px; width: 120px; border-radius: 120px; margin: 0
auto 0 auto; }
/style
div class=wrap
div class=circle2div class=circle1 /div/div
/div
I would guess SVG might be better, but I am not familiar with it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End
Also, may be able to do it with a radial gradient and some
well-planned color stops, but you may be then excluding some browsers
you need to support.
You can play here:
http://www.colorzilla.com/gradient-editor/
HTH
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote
)
25%,rgba(0,52,120,1) 25%,rgba(0,52,120,1) 38%,rgba(255,255,255,1)
38%);
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(
startColorstr='#003478', endColorstr='#ff',GradientType=1 );
width: 120px;
height: 120px;
}
HTH
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:00 PM, SSC_perl p...@surfshopcart.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
If I may, maybe this will get you started:
Tom,
I'm sorry I didn't respond earlier. I had a coding problem that
needed to be fixed, and then after that was done
Thanks Philippe.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 18, 2014, at 8:06 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 17 janv. 2014 à 23:58, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com a écrit :
As an example, i've got 8 page templates well under way and my
minified sheet is 23k. Does that sound bad
it needs to be.
As an example, i've got 8 page templates well under way and my
minified sheet is 23k. Does that sound bad?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
According to Firebug in FireFox, your span id=rdo is inside of
label id=search_store which, actually, is wrapping a lot of stuff.
That doesn't look right to me.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
/div
/body
/html
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
the same idea as the
mobile-first scenario. At desktop, the max-width: 600px MQ is not
being met, but the results show most download both images.
I'd be surprised if the results were any different if that test was a
mobile-first situation and that MQ was min-width: 600px.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
criteria for a
larger width hasn't been met, it won't load the desktop size. In
desktop-first, it is seeing and downloading the styles/assets for
desktop and then they are being overridden and replaced by smaller
ones.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
After reading through your linked article, it would appear that it
doesn't matter whether you use mobile-first or not. Am I correct
listers?
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Bob Passaro bob.pass...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's
. Working on a new project
right now where this is coming up a lot.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:00 PM
To: CSS Discussion Group
Subject: [css-d] Visual styling vs. source order
List,
Hopefully this is related to CSS enough for this list...
Visually, the layout I'm looking at has a smaller line of copy, I'd
/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
, below a nav bar.
I guess this is as much a semantics question as much of a CSS question.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Ric Nudell rnud...@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting question. But I have always believed that the semantic ranking
of your headings (h1, h2, etc.) is about meaning, the importance of the text,
This is where I was heading. I have just put the h2 before the h1
it at the moment.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
in the article, under My
Account, if your mouse leaves the dropdown while attempting to login,
well... you can't
I understand why you'd use this, but I'm not a fan.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
it is not getting used on
my page in Chrome and I'm seeing Lucida instead. FireFox is fine. Can
anyone think of why this might be? Does Chrome need the name written
differently?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
, having another
Trebuchet MS active, will mess up Chrome.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote:
nov 12 19.14 COM:
This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration
tool?
Am I missing a concept here?
If it's
sentence. Or I'm not following your thought here...
-Fred Hahnel
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
also show the unwanted blank
spacing
-Fred Hahnel
Can you post a link to an email or copy/paste a sample that presents
the problem?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
widths or # of
columns, etc.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
missing?
I would suspect the custom font isn't loading for that page, and you
are getting fallback. Using FireFox's own inspector, and choosing the
Fonts tab on the right, it isn't showing the Cabin font loading on
the checkout page.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic
loading?
Thanks,
Yazmin
Not 100% sure. I see the google font linked in the head. Only thing
I'm noticing is that the checkout page is all https and fonts aren't?
Maybe that?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
loading?
Thanks,
Yazmin
Changing the fonts to https on the fly in the inspector, in FF, got it
to work for me...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
? inspecting the page with FireBug
shows this for an image path:
content/_2414553454_large.html
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css
when
I do a local preview so why, if the paths are bad, would they show up
locally but not on the web?
Is it trying to find the images on a local file system?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
think
in this case they are negligible. There are only 2 cases where this
occurs and I optimize my images.
Thanks Philippe and all.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
, but I'm not that savvy with JS
so don't know what Google solutions I've come across are good to use.
Any thoughts? Can it be done with CSS in a way I'm not thinking of?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Tom Livingston wrote:
Having an RWD problem.
(I imagine that stands for Responsive Web Design. You are the first to
this abbreviation on this list.)
Shocking, but Yay me!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End
, 31 October 2013, Tom Livingston wrote:
List,
Having an RWD problem.
I have a container and an image. Nothing else is in the container. I
need to swap said image with another for smaller devices.
I could do this with background images except how do I handle the
height of the container
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Barney. I'm familiar with the technique, but never thought to
use it with an img. I'll give it a look.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have the link to hand
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2013, at 9:00 PM, The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
What would you recommend for a good HTML5 CSS3 reference?
Take a look at abookapart.com. Some good ones there as well.
--
Member - Liberal InternationalThis is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
tableclass=blogcellspacing=0cellpadding=0
extends beyond the right boundary of its parent element:
divid=ja-content
What browser? I'm not seeing the issue in FF 24
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
Looks like the article columns near the bottom are 50% each, plus 25px
left and right padding. Turning off the padding helps, but I think
there is more going on like that in the two columns.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Peredur pere...@peredur.net wrote:
El 21/10/13 17:12, Tom Livingston escribió:
Looks like the article columns near the bottom are 50% each, plus 25px
left and right padding. Turning off the padding helps, but I think there is
more going on like
Any advice?
-Fred Hahnel
We used the below as a starting point. Show/hide seems risky to me as
you will most likely find a client that won't hide what you need
hidden.
http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/3442/mobile-email-design-in-practice/
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front
On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Jay Tanna jta...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Will something like this work?
@media only screen and (min-width: 769px) {
img {
display:none;
}
}
For an email client that ignores MQs, the img here would still be visible in
the email.
: 100%;
margin-top: -20px;
}
#ie8 .home .content-home-right {
float: left;
width: 73%;
}
}
This is working for me as well in my IE8 WinXP VM
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
You could see if the problem appears using the browser modes in the ie10 F-12
tools. Just a thought. Not near my VMs right now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Theresa Jennings theresajennings2...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://girlscoutssangorgonio.org
The client just
, my past discussions with you in particular have resulted in my
realization that those browser modes are not to be trusted.
On Oct 8, 2013 7:49 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
You could see if the problem appears using the browser modes in the ie10
F-12 tools. Just a thought
.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
If it showed the issue, it might help see the problem as the OP doesn't
currently have access to 9. An iffy solution at best but better than sitting
idle waiting for the list to reply.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2013, at 8:06 PM
://netrenderer.com/ that helped.
S, how do I hack this to make it work in IE8 (and maybe 7)?
I'm on a Mac, running FF, Chrome, Safari.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
If it showed the issue, it might help see the problem as the OP doesn't
currently have access to 9. An iffy
So, you'd use:
.ie7 #iconsRectangle img{margin-right: .32em;}
change the amount as needed.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have no idea how to construct such a thing.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
So, how
in the snippet I sent earlier.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have no idea how to construct such a thing.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
So, how to fix... like you asked... ;-)
You have conditionals on your HTML element
.
Thank you!
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
To be clear, the page has conditional comments wrapping the HTML
element to apply classes based on version of IE. There's one for 7, 8
and 9. The classes being .ie7, .ie8 and .ie9 respectively.
You'd add those classes in front
don't have IE7 where I'm at but the 30% !important
with a margin is sure to break somewhere. It is jogging at narrow viewport
as well on Chrome and FF. With IE7, I'm guessing it has something to do
with the box-model.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
So
by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Sorry. I was referring to adding the ie7 specific right margin
adjustment to the head.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
Except, as I mentioned, the images are 308px, not 300.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Could add
/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
with content.
__
It's always going to depend on the context surrounding the centered
div. This is a viable solution under the right circumstances.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
1 oct 2013 19.42 Tom Livingston:
This is a viable solution under the right circumstances.
And just what did I just say?
The solutions I linked to are worse, are they?
I don't believe I even eluded to any such thing. I
wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Sorry...
correction:
.c2.c1{width: 20px}
?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
What about:
c2.c1{width: 20px}
?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
That is why it works that way, yes.
The engine sees two
Is the comma valid there? I've never seen that before.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Karl Snyder k...@mountain-mall.com wrote:
Seems to make a difference in Chrome if you add a comma between the classes
(see div id line below), otherwise both lines are yellow:
!DOCTYPE
I believe they meant only external users on the stats.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg webdesig...@rarpsl.com
wrote:
At 10:51 -0400 on 09/22/2013, Tom Livingston wrote about Re: [css-d] Where do
you cut-off your browser support?:
But
we recently
-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
a is an inline element and cannot contain block level elements (such as
div).
One way is:
.container {
position: relative
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston
/
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not seeing the css in the head as having any effect on the video
or it's wrapper for some reason. FireBug in FF 23.0.1.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
I use the last
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Seems to work for me. At full width I get a navigation with hover, at
narrow it's just stacked navigation items (no hover action).
Seems like a nice responsive site Tom, good work.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Tom Livingston
tom
Supported by evolt.org --
http://www.evolt.org/help_**support_evolt/http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
In my experience, yes it is 320 or 480 etc. You can test this yourself.
Make a div 320 wide, and see what fits.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 9/17/13 9:02 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Seems to work for me. At full width I get a navigation with hover, at
narrow it's just stacked navigation items (no hover action).
Seems
Can you tell me the browser, version and OS you were using? I'd like
to look into it.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:10 PM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/14/13 9:30 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Fair point.
This one works with JS disabled:
http://www.discovermvp.com/employers
not correct, it just
looks
funny, to me, to see an a around a bunch of content :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Chris Rockwell
ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
a is an inline element and cannot contain block level
601 - 700 of 1154 matches
Mail list logo
