>Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand your approach.
> What's your reasoning for using the selector hack?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Thierry
>
David Laakso wrote:
To remember, not to forget, that "display:inline;" it is only needed by a
browser that is on "death row."
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand your approach.
> What's your reasoning for using the selector hack?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Thierry
>
David Laakso wrote:
To remember, not to forget, that "display:inline;" it is only needed by a
browser that is on "death row." I
> > I'm sorry, but I don't understand your approach.
> > What's your reasoning for using the selector hack?
>
> To remember, not to forget, that "display:inline;" it is only needed
> by
> a browser that is on "death row." If that bothers you, delete the star
> hack preceding the selector. Add a c
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your approach.
What's your reasoning for using the selector hack?
--
Regards,
Thierry
To remember, not to forget, that "display:inline;" it is only needed by
a browser that is on "death row." If that bothers you, delete th
> Yes, that's correct. Note Brian has either read your response and
> deleted
> the * html preceding the selector -- or, he neglected to include *
> html
> preceding the selector in the first place. And either way, the float
> does
> not drop. But, on a purely personal note, I would leave the star
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>>> Thank you David!! I normally don't think "bug" when something is
>>>
>> going wrong
>>
>>> in my desired results.
>>>
>> I think what Alan suggested will work as well and avoids writing a
>> hack.
>>
>
> Actually I think there is no need for the
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Thank you David!! I normally don't think "bug" when something is
going wrong
in my desired results.
I think what Alan suggested will work as well and avoids writing a
hack.
Actually I think there is no need for the selector hack.
One can safely
> > Thank you David!! I normally don't think "bug" when something is
> going wrong
> > in my desired results.
>
>
> I think what Alan suggested will work as well and avoids writing a
> hack.
Actually I think there is no need for the selector hack.
One can safely style floats with display:inline
