Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
matt andrews wrote: >>> http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html > I've made some tweaks now which should have sorted out those problems > on Mac browsers. Are those tweaks out yet? I get overlapping in both Opera and Firefox windows at 'min-font-size: 14px', and it looks both cut o

Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread matt andrews
On 12/12/05, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11 Dec 2005, at 10:03 pm, matt andrews wrote: > > > Here's the reworked version. It's valid HTML 4.01 Strict, all CSS > > layout. Note the source order has been changed to something that I > > think would work better without CSS:

Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On 11 Dec 2005, at 10:03 pm, matt andrews wrote: > Here's the reworked version. It's valid HTML 4.01 Strict, all CSS > layout. Note the source order has been changed to something that I > think would work better without CSS: > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html Here is how i

Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread Anthony Ettinger
I see the same problem too...ff1.0.7 on a laptop. > > > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:03 +1100, matt andrews wrote: > > > > > Here's the reworked version. It's valid HTML 4.01 Strict, > > > > all CSS layout. > > > > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html > > > > http://xomerang.com/te

Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread Felix Miata
Christian Montoya wrote: > On 12/11/05, R. Steven Rainwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:03 +1100, matt andrews wrote: > > > Here's the reworked version. It's valid HTML 4.01 Strict, > > > all CSS layout. > > > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html >

Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread Christian Montoya
On 12/11/05, R. Steven Rainwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:03 +1100, matt andrews wrote: > > Here's the reworked version. It's valid HTML 4.01 Strict, > > all CSS layout. > > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html > > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/

Re: [css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread R. Steven Rainwater
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 00:03 +1100, matt andrews wrote: > Here's the reworked version. It's valid HTML 4.01 Strict, > all CSS layout. > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html > http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogleCSSinHead.html Neither works for me. Tried Firefox 1.0.7 a

[css-d] A better Google Search page

2005-12-11 Thread matt andrews
Over at the Web Standards Group list, we've been having a bit of fun. Thought I'd share it here, as it may well be of interest to members of this list. As you may have noticed, the current Google Search page is pretty old-skool in its markup: lots of validation errors (it doesn't even have a DOCT