Folks,
This thread needs to end now. If the various parties wish to take
their disagreements to private e-mail, that's obviously fine, but the
several thousand members of the list don't need to be subjected to an
argument in which they have no part.
I will reiterate the passage Chetan
Eric,
I will reiterate the passage Chetan quoted from the list policies,
as well as the text that follows it, because it is always relevant:
Above all, if you can't answer with a modicum of respect,
or without feeling somehow annoyed by the question, then
DO NOT ANSWER AT
At 12:08 PM -0800 1/7/11, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
That same section says:
My philosophy is that there are two kinds of questions: good questions and
unasked questions.
Unless I misunderstand the above (which is totally possible), I'd say the
original post fell into the latter category.
