I've noticed that my body background image is shifting about 1px to the
left in Firefox 3.01 only, causing some white space to show on the left
border.
Has anyone else experienced a similar problem? This did not occur in
previous versions of FF, or in any other browser.
Site: http://tinyurl.co
David Hucklesby wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:30:59 -0500, RePost wrote:
>
>> David Hucklesby wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. You can pre-load background images by including them in the
>>> markup at the top of the page BODY. Apply a width=1, height=0 so
>>> they don't take up space, and enclose them
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:30:59 -0500, RePost wrote:
> David Hucklesby wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:30:57 -0500, RePost wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Is there any way I can get the outer wrapper background to load before
>>> the
>>> content? The background image in the outer wrapper does not multiply
>>> ver
David Hucklesby wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:30:57 -0500, RePost wrote:
>
>> 1. Is there any way I can get the outer wrapper background to load before
>> the content?
>> The background image in the outer wrapper does not multiply vertically
>> (repeat-y) until
>> all the content has loaded.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:30:57 -0500, RePost wrote:
>
> 1. Is there any way I can get the outer wrapper background to load before the
> content?
> The background image in the outer wrapper does not multiply vertically
> (repeat-y) until
> all the content has loaded. This happens in Firefox and not
Correction:
That would be multiply horizontally, not vertically.
> 1. Is there any way I can get the outer wrapper background to load
> before the content? The background image in the outer wrapper does not
> multiply vertically (repeat-y) until all the content has loaded. This
> happens in Fi
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> You missed a part of my original answer, I guess…
> set the width of the outer wrapper to something that fit your image,
> and set the margins to '0 auto'.
>
> I suggested
> div {
> width 980px /* eyeballing, the width of your image -- adjust to taste
> but kee
On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:38 AM, RePost wrote:
> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>> On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:25 AM, RePost wrote:
>>
>>
>>> David Hucklesby wrote:
>>>
I think Philippe is suggesting yet another DIV. Although it sounds
like a case of "divitis," I often find a need to add an extra 10
Bill Brown wrote:
> Christopher wrote:
>
>> I deleted the email with the post of the address could you re-send it to
>> the list ?
>>
>
> Christopher:
>
> All messages are archived on the list website:
> http://www.css-discuss.org/
> ...by logging in to the "private" archives with your user
Christopher wrote:
> I deleted the email with the post of the address could you re-send it to
> the list ?
Christopher:
All messages are archived on the list website:
http://www.css-discuss.org/
...by logging in to the "private" archives with your username and
password. This is one of the reasons
Bill Brown wrote:
> RePost wrote:
>
>> Christopher wrote:
>>
>>> That link don't work, I wanted to check it out.
>>>
>> The link should be working, Christopher. Please try it once again.
>>
>
> I had no trouble accessing the link when you first posted it or again
> after Christo
RePost wrote:
> Christopher wrote:
>> That link don't work, I wanted to check it out.
> The link should be working, Christopher. Please try it once again.
I had no trouble accessing the link when you first posted it or again
after Christopher's email, for the record.
--Bill
--
/**
* Bill Br
Christopher wrote:
> That link don't work, I wanted to check it out.
>
The link should be working, Christopher. Please try it once again.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List w
RePost wrote:
> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
>> On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:25 AM, RePost wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> David Hucklesby wrote:
>>>
>>>
I think Philippe is suggesting yet another DIV. Although it sounds
like a case of "divitis," I often find a need to add an extra 1
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:25 AM, RePost wrote:
>
>
>> David Hucklesby wrote:
>>
>>> I think Philippe is suggesting yet another DIV. Although it sounds
>>> like a case of "divitis," I often find a need to add an extra 100%
>>> wide DIV around the entire content for
On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:25 AM, RePost wrote:
> David Hucklesby wrote:
>> I think Philippe is suggesting yet another DIV. Although it sounds
>> like a case of "divitis," I often find a need to add an extra 100%
>> wide DIV around the entire content for IE7's sake. When IE7 is
>> "zoomed" the backgro
David Hucklesby wrote:
> I think Philippe is suggesting yet another DIV. Although it sounds
> like a case of "divitis," I often find a need to add an extra 100%
> wide DIV around the entire content for IE7's sake. When IE7 is
> "zoomed" the background-image on BODY does not resize. Putting
> the ba
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:48:08 -0500, RePost wrote:
>> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>>
>>> A quick fix that works with some test pages here:
>>> wrap all of your contents in a and attach the background-image to
>>> that div.
>>>
> The problem with that is, I designed the body background image to dis
> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>>
>> A quick fix that works with some test pages here:
>> wrap all of your contents in a and attach the background-image
>> to that div.
The problem with that is, I designed the body background image to
display the shadow border that extends to the right and lef
> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>>
>> A quick fix that works with some test pages here:
>> wrap all of your contents in a and attach the background-image
>> to that div.
The problem with that is, I designed the body background image to
display the shadow border that extends to the right and left
On Jul 23, 2008, at 11:39 AM, RePost wrote:
> Thanks so much, Philippe.
>
> The follow-up, naturally, is, anybody got a hack or workaround?
>
>
> Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>> Known Bug.
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446284
>>
>> (it is actually a very old isue that has become
Thanks so much, Philippe.
The follow-up, naturally, is, anybody got a hack or workaround?
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> Known Bug.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446284
>
> (it is actually a very old isue that has become more visible due to a
> checkin between Fx3.0 and Fx 3.01
On Jul 23, 2008, at 11:11 AM, RePost wrote:
> I've noticed that my body background image is shifting about 1px to
> the
> left in Firefox 3.01 only, causing some white space to show on the
> left
> border.
Known Bug.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446284
(it is actually a very
I've noticed that my body background image is shifting about 1px to the
left in Firefox 3.01 only, causing some white space to show on the left
border.
Has anyone else experienced a similar problem? This did not occur in
previous versions of FF, or in any other browser.
Site: http://tinyurl.co
24 matches
Mail list logo
