On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jukka K. Korpela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually is a strong word, but I guess you are referring to some
particular browsing conditions.
Firstly, thank you for the input Jukka, and my apology for replying late.
Yes, I wrote the whole message in a more
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Kathy Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the body declaration is at the top of the style sheet and
everything is syntactically correct I'd be suspicious that the style
sheet itself is not loading - which usually comes back to path or
filename
Usamah al-Amin wrote:
Is there a URL for a page that has such a rule and fails to render the
background color?
A user on a mailing list I'm subscribed to supplied these images as
screenshots from Wikipedia, but the actual page is no longer exists,
so I can't for sure prove the
: david
To: css-d
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Could browsers miss CSS declarations?
A thought crossed my mind. Given IE6's dependence on the HasLayout bug,
would it be possible for it to not render things correctly until
something triggers hasLayout
Usamah al-Amin wrote:
Browsers usually miss downloading images, due to some network issues.
Usually is a strong word, but I guess you are referring to some
particular browsing conditions.
But I've never come to see browsers miss interpreting CSS
declarations. Is that, technically speaking,
On 06/05/2008, at 5:45 PM, Usamah al-Amin wrote:
body {
background: #dedede url(header.jpg) no-repeat top center;
}
It could very possibly to miss downloading the header image, but could
it possible to miss applying the background color (#dedede) for some
odd reason?
Check to make
