On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 22:23:48 -0400, Benjamin Rossen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I stand corrected. Thanks.
Benjamin Rossen.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Felix Miata wrote:
> body {font-family: Geneva, 'nimbus sans', 'luxi sans', Arial, sans serif;}
Can't believe I did that. The reason I replied in the first place was to
fix the fallback by including the required hyphen:
body {font-family: Geneva, 'nimbus sans', 'luxi sans', Arial, sans-serif;}
-
On 7 Oct 2005, at 10:52 am, Felix Miata wrote:
NAICT, Mac users generally prefer Geneva to Helvetica, so better would
be:
body {font-family: Geneva, 'nimbus sans', 'luxi sans', Arial, sans
serif;}
If you care about Mac OS X users, you might want to use
body {'lucida grande', 'nimbus sans', '
> Benjamin Rossen wrote:
>
>> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>>> body{font-family:Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif ;}
>
>> As far as I have been able to tell, all Linux systems have
>> an Open TT font named Sans,
>
> Sans is nothing but an alias for the OS-supplied (generic) sans-serif,
> which is the d
>> From: Benjamin Rossen
>>>
>>> body{font-family:Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif ;}
>>
>> Also, some browsers will not understand the generic term 'sans
>> serif' with a capital letter. This will give you the best
>> result on the widest range of platforms.
>>
>> body { font-family: Arial, Sans, H
Benjamin Rossen wrote:
> Tom Livingston wrote:
> > body{font-family:Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif ;}
> You can improve this. In a Windows machine you will get Arial font, and in a
> Mac you will get the similar Helvetica. However, your viewers using Linux
> are likely to get the bit-mapped Helve
> From: Benjamin Rossen
> >
> > body{font-family:Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif ;}
>
> Also, some browsers will not understand the generic term 'sans
> serif' with a capital letter. This will give you the best
> result on the widest range of platforms.
>
> body { font-family: Arial, Sans, Helvetic
Trevor Boult wrote:
http://www.tboult.co.uk
Should I really have a 17k stylesheet? seems rather big, is their a
way to be more efficient with my code?
17k isn't necessarily too big, if it covers a complex site. Looks a bit
large in your case though. I think below 6k should do fine for your
l
>
> body{font-family:Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif ;}
>
You can improve this. In a Windows machine you will get Arial font, and in a
Mac you will get the similar Helvetica. However, your viewers using Linux
are likely to get the bit-mapped Helvetica font. This font is required for
system components
you could always take the inheritance a step further and use:
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
place that at the top of your stylesheet and it will set margin and
padding to 0 on all elements. thus no need to repeat it throughout.
> you could take better advantage of the inheritance - child ele
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:56:57 -0400, Trevor Boult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Should I really have a 17k stylesheet?
Not really. Although impressively neat and tidy, you could do with some
efficiencies. Things like font-family. Unless changing font families, you
can specify it once on the
Trevor Boult said -
So I decided to give it a go on my homepage http://www.tboult.co.uk
Should I really have a 17k stylesheet? seems rather big, is their a way to
be more efficient with my code?
Hi Trevor,
you could take better advantage of the inheritance - child elements
inheriting the fo
Hi All,
I've been developing sites in tables etc for years and decided I was "out of
date" with how the web was changing.
So I decided to give it a go on my homepage http://www.tboult.co.uk
Should I really have a 17k stylesheet? seems rather big, is their a way to be more efficient with my cod
13 matches
Mail list logo
