Hello,
I'm glad to hear they are taking a better approach to vendor extensions.
However, even the new validator still has some other CSS3-related issues. This
rule (shortened down to a test case length):
#top-navigation ul ul {
box-shadow: 0px 3px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
}
produced the
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Lundgren, Chad wrote:
However, even the new validator still has some other CSS3-related issues.
This rule (shortened down to a test case length):
#top-navigation ul ul {
box-shadow: 0px 3px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
}
produced the really odd and
This is possibly relevant to Nancy's more recent query :
Philip and David,
If it were a snake... fantastic, I didn't know that had been added.
So in checking this out - what limits does it have? Are vendor prefixes
supported like Webkit etc?
Thanks,
Nancy
Philip Taylor
Sorry, attached message was lost in transit. Repeated below.
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
This is possibly relevant to Nancy's more recent query :
Philip and David,
If it were a snake... fantastic, I didn't know that had been added.
So in checking this out - what limits does it
Hi Philip,
That works much better with vendor extensions, at least in my current instance.
I'll keep using it - bookmarking.
This really helps, thank you!
Nancy
On Jan 25, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Sorry, attached message was lost in transit. Repeated below.
