On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Yogesh Agashe yogesh.aga...@gmail.comwrote:
@Tim- Ok. Thank you.
@Chetan- You links on firefox were really helpful. Also, I did not know
that IE7 does not do bicubic for PNGs. Thank you.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Chetan Crasta
Another thing to remember, for PNG images, IE 7 does not implement
bicubic-resampling (high quality scaling) even with -ms-interpolation-mode:
bicubic .
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Chetan Crasta chetancra...@gmail.comwrote:
Firefox in Linux does not implement bicubic resampling of scaled
Thank you all for your quick reply and my apologies for late answer.
@David Laasko- Thank you for the pointer on working example. It works as
expected and cross browser.
@tedd- Thanks. I followed your and David's method and it helped me solve the
problem.
@David Hucklesby- This simple line
On Saturday, September 11, 2010 6:49:33 pm Cheryl Smith wrote:
You do know that you can use server-side processing to scale images, yes?
Cordially,
David
-
Server-side processing??
Using a server side language (eg php, perl, asp, etc) to shrink images, and
save them to
Tim Climis wrote:
Using a server side language (eg php, perl, asp, etc) to shrink images, and
save them to the server. That way you shrink the image once and use it over
and over again, rather than sending everyone who visits your site a big image
(slowing page load) and then making their
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Sorry, an irrepressible urge to be pendatic forces me
to opine that ASP is a technology, not a language.
I have an irrepressible urge to conclude you must have meant pedantic.
-- Francesco
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Sandy Feldman sa...@sandyfeldman.com wrote:
ok, every now and then I laugh out loud at something on the list ...
thanks!
Sandy
Me too, Sandy! And now I have an irrepressible urge for a delicious
breakfast sandwich to accompany my fresh coffee.
--
Firefox in Linux does not implement bicubic resampling of scaled images. It
instead uses nearest-neighbor resampling. This is a known issue and,
unfortunately, there is no workaround. Here are two links where the issue is
discussed:
Hello,
I am developing a website where we deal with lot of thumbnail images which
are almost always scaled down or up.
I use ubuntu 10.04 and have observed that images which are scaled down look
very poor in Firefox, which is not the case with Google Chrome. Also images
in IE7 on windows xp look
On 9/11/10 11:16 AM, Yogesh Agashe wrote:
Hello,
I am developing a website where we deal with lot of thumbnail images which
are almost always scaled down or up.
I use ubuntu 10.04 and have observed that images which are scaled down look
very poor in Firefox, which is not the case with Google
At 8:46 PM +0530 9/11/10, Yogesh Agashe wrote:
Hello,
I am developing a website where we deal with lot of thumbnail images which
are almost always scaled down or up.
I use ubuntu 10.04 and have observed that images which are scaled down look
very poor in Firefox, which is not the case with
On 9/11/10 8:16 AM, Yogesh Agashe wrote:
Hello,
I am developing a website where we deal with lot of thumbnail images
which are almost always scaled down or up.
I use ubuntu 10.04 and have observed that images which are scaled
down look very poor in Firefox, which is not the case with Google
You do know that you can use server-side processing to scale images, yes?
Cordially,
David
-
Server-side processing??
Cheryl
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
I'm working on a layout that makes heavy use of a rounded corner
technique using images and I've just stumbled across a bug in IE6 that
appears to break just about every rounded corner technique I've seen.
So, from what I've gathered, IE6 will scale images up (even background
images) if the
Apparently, this has been around for quite some time (the Dell article
is from 2003) ... and Dell is still shipping laptops with the default
setting causing this problem.
All Acers I had chance to use during this year in 1440x1050 suffered
from the same problem (way too big resulution on a
15 matches
Mail list logo
