Hi Brian,
CSS works better when the page structure is not minimal. Putting a logo
inside a div allows you to add further styles to the context you're
currently using. For example, you could add a background image (or more
images with CSS3) to the div, thus creating a more visually appealing effect
On 7/18/11 2:00 PM, Brian M. Curran wrote:
Why does www.seobook.com put his logo in a div? It seems like its' only
purpose is to hold the code class="logo". Wouldn't it have been easier to
put the class="logo" in the img tag like how I did on my site:
www.draftingservices.com ?
Brian
Le
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Brian M. Curran
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why does www.seobook.com put his logo in a div? It seems like its' only
> purpose is to hold the code class="logo". Wouldn't it have been easier to
> put the class="logo" in the img tag like how I did on my site:
> www.draftings
Brian M. Curran wrote:
> Why does www.seobook.com put his logo in a div? It seems like its' only
> purpose is to hold the code class="logo". Wouldn't it have been easier to
> put the class="logo" in the img tag like how I did on my site:
> www.draftingservices.com ?
Well, clearly I don't /know
Hi Brian,
CSS works better when the page structure is not minimal. Putting a logo
inside a div allows you to add further styles to the context you're
currently using. For example, you could add a background image (or more
images with CSS3) to the div, thus creating a more visually appealing effect
Hello,
Why does www.seobook.com put his logo in a div? It seems like its' only
purpose is to hold the code class="logo". Wouldn't it have been easier to
put the class="logo" in the img tag like how I did on my site:
www.draftingservices.com ?
I'm not criticizing here. Rather, I'm just trying t
