@Phillipe: Mainly because they're _already_ header links. The a tag is
in the context of header. As Bobby pointed out, the inclusion of a
class there seems like unnecessary cluttering of the markup to
accomplish a visual effect. I'm trying to stay away from doing that.
@Gunlaug. That does flip my
Bobby Jack wrote:
> It's a shame that there's no concept of 'inheritance' in CSS that
> would allow grouping of, for example, headings (h1-h6) or lists (ul,
> ol, dl).
AFAIK, the W3C CSS WG is open for suggestions. If enough people suggest
something along the same lines, and can back it up, they
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what's wrong with using a class on those links ? Keeps
> the selector
> much shorter...
> .my-heading-links:link, .my-heading-links:visited {}
I'd argue against that - much better, IMO, to keep the markup as clean as
possib
On Sep 30, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Tim Visher wrote:
> I think there must be a way to compress the following style, but I
> can't figure it out. Help's appreciated.
>
> `h1 a:link, h1 a:visited, h2 a:link, h2 a:visited, h3 a:link, h3
> a:visited, h4 a:link, h4 a:visited, h5 a:link, h5 a:visited, h6
>
Hello Everyone,
I think there must be a way to compress the following style, but I
can't figure it out. Help's appreciated.
`h1 a:link, h1 a:visited, h2 a:link, h2 a:visited, h3 a:link, h3
a:visited, h4 a:link, h4 a:visited, h5 a:link, h5 a:visited, h6
a:link, h6 a:visited {}`
I think a much m
