Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

On 11/09/2013 7:01 PM, Albert van der Veen wrote: Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with closing a tag. I closed it like this: which completely(!) messed up the page. Now it's closed this way and everything's fine :) I'm aware of the validation errors, there

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with closing a tag. I closed it like this: which completely(!) messed up the page. Now it's closed this way class="searchbutton" > and everything's fine :) I'm aware of the validation errors, there's a div that's not closed.

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

Albert, I'm not seeing your problem. Have your fixed it? > On September 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM Albert van der Veen > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you > can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone > see whethe

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

David, I really don't see how the three HTML errors would case his problem. And, you might want to check the CSS before running a validation. He's using CSS3 that validation does not appear to have been run under CSS3 but rather CSS2.1 making the error irrelevant. And, even if they were the only t

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:20:01 +0200, Albert van der Veen wrote: | Hi all, | | I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you | can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone | see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems

[css-d] Site check please IE9/10

Hi all, I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems with? I can't imagine css differences between IE9 and 10 being so huge i

Re: [css-d] site check please

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Erik Visser wrote: > > I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different > browsers and platforms. > > http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl > > Thank you, Erik Visser > The pages in the site seem to perform as expected in a Windows notebook in the cu

Re: [css-d] site check please

> Can you please view this website and give me your comments? > Especially from technical point of view. > Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever? > > I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different > browsers and platforms. > > http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl If you wi

[css-d] site check please

Can you please view this website and give me your comments? Especially from technical point of view. Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever? I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different browsers and platforms. http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl Thank you, Erik Visser _

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ed Goodson wrote: >> > >> http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html >> >> >> > I do have an issue on IE though at the moment, the text string: Header2 and > the text below is not showing within the confines of the grey background > image. How can I mak

Re: [css-d] Site check please

> > > > - Original Message - From: "Theresa Mesa" > > To: "Norman Fournier" > Cc: "CSS Discuss" > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM > Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please > > >> Well, according to your source code,

Re: [css-d] Site check please

> - Original Message - > From: "Theresa Mesa" > To: "Norman Fournier" > Cc: "CSS Discuss" > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM > Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please > > >> Well, according to your source code, ther

Re: [css-d] Site check please

right place? Thank-you very much, Kind Regards, Ed - Original Message - From: "Theresa Mesa" To: "Norman Fournier" Cc: "CSS Discuss" Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please > Well, according to your sour

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look like the image is on the server. Did you upload the images folder to the server? Is the logo in the images folder? Theresa On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Norman Fournier wrote: > Safari 4.

Re: [css-d] Site check please

What kind of things are you looking for us to find? On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ed Goodson wrote: > Hi all, > Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks > fine to me on ff > The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. > http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html > > T

Re: [css-d] Site check please

"Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html"; Seems to look the same for me in FF and IE 6 on windows. Posted screen shot here for IE6 for you: http://www.k

[css-d] Site check please

Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html Thank-you very much, Cheers, Ed __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] Site check please

David Laakso wrote: > Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my >> calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if >> it's better now: >> >> http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html >> >> thanks

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:18 PM, David Laakso wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > > Lorraine, > > Getting your page functional in IE 6/7 required hacking it from here to > Havana. And it still was not right. If you need to keep your current markup, > then someone else on the list may provide a better

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Hi guys, > > So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox & Safari, and Windows Firefox > & IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other > browsers and resolutions. > > http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html > > Thanks very much,

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Hi David, > > Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my > calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if > it's better now: > > http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html > > thanks very much > Lorraine > For a lot

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Thanks for your reply, David- although I do admit I am confused by > some of it... what are "rivers"? I'd appreciate any ideas you might > have on what I've done wrong in my CSS as well... thanks again :) > > Lorraine > Think of the text-block as a piece of f

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > > So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox & Safari, and Windows Firefox > & IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other > browsers and resolutions. > > http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html

[css-d] Site check please

Hi guys, So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox & Safari, and Windows Firefox & IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other browsers and resolutions. http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html Thanks very much, Lorraine __

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ib Jensen wrote: > 2009/5/20 David Laakso : > >> Ib Jensen wrote: >> > > >> Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the >> missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be >> that neither of the more important content images in the ri

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009/5/20 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: >> >> 2009/5/20 David Laakso : >>> >>> Ib Jensen wrote: > This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS > file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 "conditional comment." It will > work either way. > * html div#side {width:9

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009/5/20 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: >> > Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the > missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?),  may be > that neither of the more important content images in the right column, > reside in their respectiv

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ib Jensen wrote: > Hi > > Link: http://ikjensen.dk > > Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) > > > Locally known issues: > > IE6 dont show my link-"icons" > > IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. > > > At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?: > > IE6: Arghhh > The template _are_ not

[css-d] Site check please

Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-"icons" IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?: IE6: Arghhh The template _are_ not made for IE6! IE7: Page got a horizontal sc

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On 2009/05/17 19:30 (GMT-0700) Jody Levinson composed: > I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as > far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the > pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and > the navbar position

[css-d] Site check please

Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-"icons" IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom: IE6: Ahhh The template not made for IE6! IE7: Page got a horizontal scroll-bar,

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On 19/05/2009, at 3:57 AM, Jody Levinson wrote: > The image at the bottom is just a plain old transparent gif with a > black mask. I'm not wild about how the mask shows over a light > background, but no mask leaves jaggedy edges on the hands. It's a > tradeoff. The way around this is to save the

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On May 17, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Jody Levinson wrote: > Hi, all, > > I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as > far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the > pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and > the navbar positio

Re: [css-d] site check please?

Hi Chris Actually, as Bill points out, "stop the presses" is correct in this sense. It refers to when a late breaking important news story would come in to a newspaper after the edition was already on the printing press. They'd stop the printing presses to update. The image at the bottom is

Re: [css-d] site check please?

wow, thank you for the screen shot. I will adjust. On May 17, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Jody Levinson wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right >> as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I >> open the page

Re: [css-d] site check please?

Chris Blake wrote: > And 'stop the presses' is wrong, 'press' is plural. Uhh, not always, and certainly not when used as Jody is using it: as part of the age old saying: "Stop the presses." This goes way back to the days of the printing press and refers literally to stopping the printing presse

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On 18/05/2009, at 12:06 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Jody Levinson wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as >> far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open >> the >> pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the l

Re: [css-d] site check please?

Jody Levinson wrote: > Hi, all, > > I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as > far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the > pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and > the navbar position overlaps the top of th

[css-d] site check please?

Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and the navbar position overlaps the top of the content area. I don't really

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

> Subject: [css-d] Site check please... > > I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a > manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some > issues. > > What I can see off the bat... > > - In Safari, the

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Michael Beaudoin a écrit : > I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a > manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some > issues. > > What I can see off the bat... > > - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox & > IE) >

[css-d] Site check please...

I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some issues. What I can see off the bat... - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox & IE) - I've put the large type (our firm) at th

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - Cedar Lake Inn

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > 11/13/2008 > > I'd appreciate a check of these four pages, > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html, > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html, > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetphotogallery.html. > > > P

[css-d] Site Check Please - Cedar Lake Inn

11/13/2008 I'd appreciate a check of these four pages, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquet.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetph

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

t 28, 2008, at 3:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:30:07 +0100 > From: Gunlaug S?rtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2 > To: Peter Hyde-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

The height issue is definitely fixed in IE6. The entity issue is only an issue in the address line, but is not an issue in the times that the restaurant is open, yet uses some of the same bullets. Can you use the same coding for the bullets in the address line that you use in the times that the r

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

David Laakso wrote: >> Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: >> >> http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html >> http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html >> >> >> > > > 1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large > gap you

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

> Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html > > > 1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large gap you mention in any of my XP or Mac OS X 10

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

- Original Message - From: "David Laakso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter Hyde-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Nancy Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lak

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

You could try that. I have done the same thing and it works. Nancy On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nancy Johnson wrote: >> >> The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image >> on the homepage is 1/2" high and the first line of add

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

Nancy Johnson wrote: > The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image > on the homepage is 1/2" high and the first line of address is cut so > only the bottom half shows. > It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height. > > Nancy > > >> Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: >>

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

505 (United Kingdom) - Original Message - From: "Peter Hyde-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 3:27 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn > 10/25/2008 > > Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of n

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2" high and the first line of address is cut so only the bottom half shows. It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height. Nancy On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:25 PM, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > 10/25/2008 > > Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake > Inn index page and one > interior page here, > > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html > > http://www.fat

[css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake Inn index page and one interior page here, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIresetcss.cs

[css-d] Site check please - DAC

Hi *Peter, I am new member and I am still finding my feet in this forum. I happen to have a similar problem, have tried everything and even though I am just a placement student , the professional staff doesn't know how to deal with this as well. so I created this website and no matter whether I

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC *round 2*

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: >>> http://www.fatpawdesign.com/DAC/DACproducts.html > All: Thanks for the look-see and feed-back. > Georg: I think I have the transparent borders issue fixed. Would you > please make another quick check? Borders ok. IE6 need a little bit more help though. 1: There's t

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > 10/06/2008 > > Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No > breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know > if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. > > > Peter > > O.K. Mac OS X 10.4.11 Op

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No > breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know > if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. Ok in IE6. > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/DAC/DACproducts

[css-d] Site check please - DAC

10/06/2008 Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. If it isn't, you'll see plain text *The Drug Affected Children Website* (it i

Re: [css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:39:46 +0800, WEZ! wrote: > Heya all, > > Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is > rendering > without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html > > I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone

Re: [css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

> > > Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page > is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. > http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html > > > It does not render correctly in IE6 - the "Gray" areas (designed by and other) one floats all the way to the left and the other al

[css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

Heya all, Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone ideally could put it through its paces on IE6 that would be

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: > Dear David, > > Thank you for your feedback - my apologies for a late response. > > What is the suggestion/recommendation/community view for font > formatting with CSS? > > Regards > PWP > > >> >>> >>> Would you please provide feedback for the website

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

itus - Original Message - From: Professional Web Pages - Information To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:43 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please To whom it may concern, Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.co

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: > > Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/ > > Thank you. > > Regards > PWP > > Is the blue block offset 24px on the left intentional? Some folks may have trouble with the tiny frozen fonts in IE. And not everyon

[css-d] Site Check Please

To whom it may concern, Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/ Thank you. Regards PWP __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

on the Order, FAQ and Contact US pages the leftcolumn-two div contains a child div called post which has some padding. This shifts all content down and across, not sure if this is intentional. lister 2008/6/3 Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) > Raven

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Raven Gildea wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > May I request a site check please? It all looks okay > on my own Mac > and PC > > browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you > might see that I > don't: > > > > http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ > > > >

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

> Hi all, > > May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC > browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: > > http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ > > Thanks very much! > Lorraine Hi Lorraine: I'm seeing two small issues in IE5/Mac.

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

> Hi all, > > May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC > browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: > > http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ > > Thanks very much! > Lorraine Everything works for me in Windows IE6 and Firefox. Only

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Hi all, > > May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC > browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: > > http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ > > Thanks very much! > Lorraine > Looked fine to me

[css-d] Site check please...

Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine __ cs

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:10:39 -0400, David Laakso wrote: >> > re: > > > One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove the > menu to the > left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 does not support > min/max). [...] > >

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: > re: > > > One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove > the menu to the left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 > does not support min/max). This will avoid the h-scroll bar. The menu

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Peter Bradley wrote: > > There are a couple of other things I've noticed, which someone might be > able to help with: > > * Is there any way of stopping the navigation menu from wrapping when > the screen size gets smaller. I'd prefer horizontal scroll bars, if > it's possible > > * In IE6, t

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: > > Let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that the length of the > lines of primary content text (measure) may be a little long for > those who view the page at screen resolution 1280 and higher > (particularly in laptops). > > Ah. OK. Got you. I agree, as we

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Peter Bradley wrote: > Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: > >> Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi. >> > > Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of > terminology I've missed, I think. > re: Let's just say, for the

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: > Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi. Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of terminology I've missed, I think. > Pixel font-sizes are not very user friendly. Yes, you're absolutely right. I hadn't realised I'd done that. Must

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Peter Bradley wrote: > Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley: > >> >> http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html >> >> >> > > If anyone has any comments on the site, though, I'd be very pleased to > get any feedback. I'm a bit of a newbie to this CSS stuff, so any > suggestions would be very grate

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Ysgrifennodd Konstantin Kuchugurin: > Piter try this > > > src="image_folder/Your_Image.jpg" alt="" /> > > Some text ... Much more text... :) > > This will be fixed your problem (I Think) - just look at > http://www.alicante.ru/document_view.htm?did=6 (it site on russian) > but you c

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley: > Could someone please check just the home page for me at: > > http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html > > Sorry to reply to myself, but I've sorted it. It *was* a screen-size thing. I checked it out on my wife's eee PC. I've now given the photo a width of 80% a

[css-d] Site Check please

Could someone please check just the home page for me at: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html My client tells me that the photo obscures some of the text using FireFox on a Mac. I don't have a Mac to check it on, but it seems fine everywhere else ... I wonder if it's a screen size/resolut

Re: [css-d] site check please

thanks for the feedback guys... 2008/5/27 David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rob freeman wrote: >> >> nearly there, >> >> please can you check this site for any obvious pitfalls... >> http://www.nest-life.com/update/ >> >> thanks >> >> > > > No major issues that I could see in compliant brows

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: >>> Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of >>> www.whitehouseinwestbend.com >>> >>> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css >>> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css >>> >>> >>> Peter >>> >> > > David: > > Thanks

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > Thanks. I set the margins to -2px; and I still lose part of the > vertical rules in WIN2K/IE6 at work, although the floats stay in > place. I have changed them to -1px. Would you please take a quick > look and let me know if 'that' has resolved the issue. Otherwise I

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

>> Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of >> www.whitehouseinwestbend.com >> >> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css >> http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css >> >> Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always >>

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > 05/22/2008 > > Hi All: > > Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of > www.whitehouseinwestbend.com > > http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css > http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css > > Comments regarding ease of use/a

[css-d] site check please - WHIWB

05/22/2008 Hi All: Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always w

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

On 22/05/2008, at 12:39 AM, David Laakso wrote: Karl Hardisty wrote: > http://mothership.co.nz/blog > > > All feedback greatly accepted. > > > > Karl > > It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl. Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct. Aside: The title of the document does not seem to appear i

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Karl Hardisty wrote: > http://mothership.co.nz/blog > > > All feedback greatly accepted. > > > > Karl > > It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl. Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct. Aside: The title of the document does not seem to appear in the text. Font-scaling breaks the long word "

[css-d] Site Check please

http://mothership.co.nz/blog Our blog uses GridFocus from 5thirtyone.com with some custom modifications. Just now I've swapped the first and second columns around as I prefer the larger column to be in the centre, as (to me) it looks more proportioned. I've checked it in OS X: Safari 3+,

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

I fixed the IE 6&7 problem for you, using a different css rollover: HTML:

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Matthew Stoneback wrote: > > IE6 & IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has > spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this > way in any other browser (that I am aware of). They appear to be > approximately 2 to 3 pixels in height. >

[css-d] Site Check Please

As usual, I am back on the forum asking for a site check. Here are my known issues (as far as I can tell one is only visible in IE6 & IE7): IE6 & IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this way i

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

Thanks for your feedback but I'm gonna have to probably remove it altogether. I actually placed it in there thinking I had a haslayout bug but, it turns out it was a file call to a .htc file to handle transparency in IE6 - something I wasn't supposed to do being that the challenge is not to touch t

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

Elli Vizcaino wrote: > > >>> http://e7flux.com/csszengarden/chaoticspring.html >>> >>> You have height:1%; on the below selector. You may (?) want to feed that only to IE/6, as compliant browsers might do better without it at +2 font-scaling. .p5 { height: 1%; } __

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

+ bits > > Flatulus Antiquitus > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Elli Vizcaino > > To: CSS Discuss > > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM > > Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS > Zen Garden Project > > >

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

its > Flatulus Antiquitus > > > - Original Message - > From: Elli Vizcaino > To: CSS Discuss > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM > Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project > > > Hello, > > I was given the CSS Zen Garden pr

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

From: Elli Vizcaino To: CSS Discuss Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project Hello, I was given the CSS Zen Garden project as a design test and I have something up on my server that I'm working on: http:/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >