Well, if the validator were any good, it would tell you to use a valid
doctype...
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary
...when serving pages as 'text/html'.
Validator I used was off Dreamweaver 8 and also off Firefox Web Developer
Tools. The latter is HTML Tidy; I
Peach Lynda L CTR USAF 96 CG/SCWOE wrote:
I'm gathering the problem is this: meta http-equiv=content-type
content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 /
What should it be?
Never mind the meta-element. It doesn't matter out on the web.
This is what W3C states:
- The doctype you've used: XHTML
Others can join Georg I in this discussion ... :-)
Never mind the meta-element. It doesn't matter out on the web.
This is what W3C states:
- The doctype you've used: XHTML 1.1, *should not* be used for a document
served as 'text/html'.
- You're left with (HTML compatible) XHTML 1.0 or
Peach Lynda L CTR USAF 96 CG/SCWOE wrote:
Others can join Georg I in this discussion ... :-)
Yes, please do :-)
Nothing like a creative discussion in the midst of all the IE-bugs we
have to kill.
Never mind the meta-element. It doesn't matter out on the web.
Okay -- I'll remove that line
