+1
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Jul 15, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Chris Williams wrote:
> IMHO, the best design approach is to start with width. It's the best
> indicator of overall size, and allows you to "get in the ballpark" with
> respect to the question: is thi
IMHO, the best design approach is to start with width. It's the best
indicator of overall size, and allows you to "get in the ballpark" with
respect to the question: is this a desktop, tablet or phone?
Once you've established width, you can configure your content to look good
with that, and alway
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 7/13/15 2:44 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
>
>> I know it can be up to personal taste, if you create a portrait responsive
>> page, does it matter if it's not designed for landscape ?
>>
>>
> I would think that would depend on what device a vi
On 7/13/15 2:44 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
I know it can be up to personal taste, if you create a portrait responsive
page, does it matter if it's not designed for landscape ?
I would think that would depend on what device a visitor uses. Some portable
devices I see people using sit in a cra
On Monday, July 13, 2015, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> I know it can be up to personal taste, if you create a portrait responsive
> page, does it matter if it's not designed for landscape ?
>
> Christopher
> __
>
I suppose you could fix the content max-width at desired
I know it can be up to personal taste, if you create a portrait
responsive page, does it matter if it's not designed for landscape ?
Christopher
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/lis
