Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-11-07 Thread Graham Reeds
Chris Akers wrote: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/graham.reeds/space >>>Also, I noticed that #nav-rankings-option2a and >>>#nav-rankings-option3a's background image jump up a pixel or two on >>>hover. >>> >>> >>> >>That is due to me not bothering with lining up the select

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-11-02 Thread Chris Akers
>>> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/graham.reeds/space >> >> Also, I noticed that #nav-rankings-option2a and >> #nav-rankings-option3a's background image jump up a pixel or two on >> hover. >> > That is due to me not bothering with lining up the selection's > properly. I can't decide whether the line

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-11-02 Thread Graham Reeds
Chris Akers wrote: >>The original problem is the fact that I had to reduce the size of the >>text via "font-size: 1px" to get it to render properly on IE6. To me >>that seems rather hacky and I was wondering if there was any more >>elegant way of achieving this. >> >> > >Try >#nav li { >

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-11-01 Thread Chris Akers
> The original problem is the fact that I had to reduce the size of the > text via "font-size: 1px" to get it to render properly on IE6. To me > that seems rather hacky and I was wondering if there was any more > elegant way of achieving this. Try #nav li { float: left; overflow:

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-11-01 Thread Graham Reeds
css.student wrote: >what are the problems? All that I can see is that the link text is not >being hidden...anything else? > >to hide the text, you'll need to edit the markup: >link > >and the css, accordingly: > >li a b {visibility:hidden;} > >- CSS Student > > >On 10/31/05, Vicki Stebbins <[EMAIL

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-11-01 Thread css.student
what are the problems? All that I can see is that the link text is not being hidden...anything else? to hide the text, you'll need to edit the markup: link and the css, accordingly: li a b {visibility:hidden;} - CSS Student On 10/31/05, Vicki Stebbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:26 AM

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-10-31 Thread Vicki Stebbins
At 11:26 AM 31/10/2005, Graham Reeds wrote: >I have implemented a suckerfish menu for a redesign of a game site. > >However every implementation I come up with works fine in FF and Opera8, >but fails in IE6 (only tested on Windows). > >I also used the block image code which I was having trouble wit

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-10-31 Thread Bob Smith
Graham, An alternative I have used is to look at the original suckerfish dropdown which gives a drowp-down background image and intergrate it into the revised suckerfish model. You need to create a class for the 'parent' items and another for the 'child' items. This works in most browsers but not

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-10-30 Thread Graham Reeds
Linda H wrote: > >> IE5.x on both Mac and Windows is really a dying breed. > > > Don't I wish! Unfortunately, some 95% of the people accessing the site > I'm working on are using IE and the people in charge don't take kindly > to me telling the users they should download Firefox in response to

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-10-30 Thread Graham Reeds
Bill Gates wrote: > I don't know whether you care or not, but it doesn't work right on OS > X, Firefox or Opera. IE5.2 is hopeless, as well. > > On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Graham Reeds wrote: > >> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/graham.reeds/space > > Is that on just the 'main' menu or you saying

[css-d] Suckerfish blues (again)

2005-10-30 Thread Graham Reeds
I have implemented a suckerfish menu for a redesign of a game site. However every implementation I come up with works fine in FF and Opera8, but fails in IE6 (only tested on Windows). I also used the block image code which I was having trouble with last week (thanks for the help). The test sit