Gene Falck wrote:
> You wrote:
>> Why do you use a span with a class when you already
>> have the html tags for them? Can't you just tell the
>> and tags to look the way you wish with
>> css instead of making new classes? They are already
>> there, and they seem more semantic (maybe not, kinda
>>
HI Joseph,
You wrote:
> Why do you use a span with a class when you already
> have the html tags for them? Can't you just tell the
> and tags to look the way you wish with
> css instead of making new classes? They are already
> there, and they seem more semantic (maybe not, kinda
> like and ,
> I use a span with class="sb" or class="sp" and
> style the classes with my choice of font size
> and with positioning to bump the items down and
> up as needed. I also style the line height of
> the block element involved with enough room for
> the repositioned items; I then have enough room
> f
Hi Ron,
You wrote:
> ... but my question here is what to do about
> superscripts -- does the fact that people can
> set a minimum font size mean that we might as
> well throw superscripts out the window (at
> least, if we don't want them to end up making
> a mess of our typography)? ...
IMO, not
Ron Koster wrote:
> Just to change the subject...
Ok, but we're still in the same thread :-)
> - footnotes; - for numbers like "1st", "2nd", "3rd" (where the latter
> half, er, two-thirds is superscripted); - certain words like "Ye",
> "Dr", etc.
>
> If I put those parts in superscript -- and
Just to change the subject...
At 05:12 PM 2/18/2009 +0100, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>Check out what happens when those sizes meet 'minimum font size' and
>other "barriers" across browser-land.
>So, no, sorry, "proportional" is not guaranteed, no matter the method.
This is, in fact, *exactly* another
