Re: [css-d] There has got to be a better way

Alan Gresley wrote: > > > Firefox (Gecko 1.9), Mozilla (Gecko 1.7) IE8, Opera 9.6+ and Safari 4 > supports the proper rendering of this test case which shows the majority > of the element's width disappearing outside the left edge

Re: [css-d] There has got to be a better way

Gillespie, Michael A (Mike) wrote: > http://www.striking.com/ > That's pretty much what I did which is why I was seeing if there were other > ways; > > The limitation is that you have to use your image as a background image to do > this. I would like to be able to figure out how to wrap the t

Re: [css-d] There has got to be a better way

> That's pretty much what I did which is why I was seeing if there were other > ways; > > The limitation is that you have to use your image as a background image to do > this. I would like to be able to figure out how to wrap the text about the > viewable outline of an inline image; like the

Re: [css-d] There has got to be a better way

ded to be. -Douglas Adams Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge - Darwin From: ke...@rodenhofer.com [mailto:ke...@rodenhofer.com] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:23 AM To: Gillespie, Michael A (Mike); css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: RE: [css-d] There has got to be

Re: [css-d] There has got to be a better way

> I am laying out text on an angle to follow a background graphic. There has > got to be a better way that stacking floated divs and adjusting the width of > each one. See http://www.striking.com. Is there a better way to do this? > > > Hey, if there is a better way, I'd love to see it... th

Re: [css-d] There has got to be a better way

-Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Gillespie, Michael A (Mike) Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:54 AM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: [css-d] There has got to be a better way I am laying out text

[css-d] There has got to be a better way

I am laying out text on an angle to follow a background graphic. There has got to be a better way that stacking floated divs and adjusting the width of each one. See http://www.striking.com. Is there a better way to do this? M