Thank you, Philippe! It's interesting that the anchor's color doesn't seem
to be specified in the W3C document.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://
On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Ezequiel Garzón wrote:
> Thank you all for your replies! They have taught me a lot in very
> little
> time.
>
> Is it possible to open the default stylesheet? Are settings such as
> 'a {
> color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }' de facto or formal
> standard
Thank you all for your replies! They have taught me a lot in very little
time.
Is it possible to open the default stylesheet? Are settings such as 'a {
color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }' de facto or formal standards?
Cheers,
Ezequiel
--- On Tue, 10/6/09, Ezequiel Garzón wrote:
> Greetings. As you will be able to
> tell, I'm a CSS rookie. My doubt is,
> if the body contains all the other containers, why does
> body { ... }
> behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed
> to
> cascade? Inheritable properties at l
Greetings. As you will be able to tell, I'm a CSS rookie. My doubt is,
if the body contains all the other containers, why does body { ... }
behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed to
cascade? Inheritable properties at least, no? But then I find that
body { color:black; }
and
On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Ezequiel Garzón wrote:
> My doubt is,
> if the body contains all the other containers, why does body { ... }
> behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed to
> cascade? Inheritable properties at least, no? But then I find that
>
> body { color:black; }
Greetings. As you will be able to tell, I'm a CSS rookie. My doubt is,
if the body contains all the other containers, why does body { ... }
behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed to
cascade? Inheritable properties at least, no? But then I find that
body { color:black; }
and
;
}
img{
border:0:
}
Hope that helps,
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garth Jantzen
Sent: 31 January 2007 02:37
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] universal selector to set defaults
real quick,
i want to use the
On 1/31/07, Garth Jantzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> real quick,
>
> i want to use the * selector to set all my default values (except fonts, i
> know they will cascade). something like this:
>
>
> * {
> margin: 0;
> padding: 0;
> list-style: none;
> font-style:
real quick,
i want to use the * selector to set all my default values (except fonts, i
know they will cascade). something like this:
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style: none;
font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal;
border-collapse: collapse;
* Raymond Rodriguez wrote:
>It's supposed to look like this in the end but I've not been
>successful in my attempt at assigning selectors to the body. There is
>a container on the right-hand side that I named "#infoSidebar" (line
>73 in the CSS file) and I attempted to assign it universally t
Hello again. I'm doing some reorganization of my CSS for this page.
I'm focusing on getting only this page to look right and then I'll
reassign the other pages to the new CSS file.
It's supposed to look like this in the end but I've not been
successful in my attempt at assigning selectors to
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Use of the universal selector
> makes no other sense than that it adds specificity to the plain
> ID-selector.
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> The first rule will apply to the element with the id="leftcol"
> regardless of it's position in DOM.
The universal selector in the fir
On 10/10/06, Jørgen Farum Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any difference at all between
> * #leftcol {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
> #leftcol * {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
The first one is equivalent to this version, with no * at all:
#leftcol {font-family: arial, sans-serif;
Jørgen Farum Jensen wrote:
> Is there any difference at all between
> * #leftcol {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
> and
> #leftcol * {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
Definitely!
The first example targets #leftcol _inside_ _any_ element, but *only*
#leftcol (and elements inside #leftcol). Use of
> Is there any difference at all between
> * #leftcol {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
> and
> #leftcol * {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
Yes, there is. The first rule will apply to the element with the id="leftcol"
regardless of it's position in DOM.
The second rule will apply to _all elements_ w
Is there any difference at all between
* #leftcol {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
and
#leftcol * {font-family:arial,sans-serif;}
--
Med venlig hilsen
Jørgen Farum Jensen
http://www.webdesign101.dk
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTE
17 matches
Mail list logo
