Roger Roelofs wrote:
Erik,
On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Erik Harris wrote:
There are times when I'd like a link to contain both an image and
text. I
want the text to be underlined, as usual, but I don't want the
image to be
underlined. This works fine in most browsers, but Firefox
francky wrote:
But in case of html4.01 Transitional without dtd-declaration:
http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/img-and-text-hovering-b.htm
I should go for my 2nd castle, which I like most of all. ;-)
Note that such a declaration is the same as quirks mode to browsers,
On 11/15/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd generally advice against quirks mode in any browser but IE6.
Isn't it time we let quirks mode go altogether? You're not making the
most of IE6's already impaired render engine, and inviting a lot of
box model hacks. Means abandoning
I agree with the img {display:block } tip. I always put that at the
beginning of my stylesheets, and only make them inline if I really
need it (which is almost never).
I may be wrong, but I believe it's bad practise to enclose the image
and text in the same a tag. Inevitably you get a bit of
I know this has been asked before, but the thread I found about this
question didn't include a working answer.
There are times when I'd like a link to contain both an image and text. I
want the text to be underlined, as usual, but I don't want the image to be
underlined. This works fine in
Erik,
On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Erik Harris wrote:
There are times when I'd like a link to contain both an image and
text. I
want the text to be underlined, as usual, but I don't want the
image to be
underlined. This works fine in most browsers, but Firefox insists on
underlining
Erik Harris wrote:
[...]
Here's a page with numerous examples of what I'm talking about:
http://www.eharrishome.com/halloween/pumpkins.html
I've tried various variations of
a img {text-decoration: none; border: none !important}
with no luck.
Nothing seems to turn off the rather unsightly
