Carl Youngblood wrote:
> Doesn't work. The moment I remove display:table, whether or
> not I have width: 100%, the border and background image
> disappear.
Ehm.. option 2 was meant to be used without option 1, not in
addition to it.
IOW: leave display:table in place, but add width:100%.
--
Els
Doesn't work. The moment I remove display:table, whether or not I
have width: 100%, the border and background image disappear.
On 6/19/06, Els <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, use option number 2: add a set width to #container:
> width:100%;
__
Carl Youngblood wrote:
> On 6/19/06, Els <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 6/19/06, Carl Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
http://constructioncapitalsource.com/test/sample.html
[snip]
>> if you either take off
>> "display:table", or add a set width to #container, nothing
>> collapses,
When I remove the display:table, my pixel borders disappear. Do you
have any idea about how I can keep those borders but get rid of the
other unwanted properties? I'd like this div to expand as the width
of the browser expands.
THanks,
Carl
On 6/19/06, Els <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Youn
Carl Youngblood wrote:
> On 6/19/06, Carl Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm having a strange problem where clicking on an ordinary a
>> href link is not loading the page it points to properly in
>> Firefox. Instead, it is just jumbling up the placement of
>> the page but not sending ano
One more detail: apparently the bug doesn't occur on the links at the
top-right of the page--just on the links that are below the horizontal
menu.
On 6/19/06, Carl Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a strange problem where clicking on an ordinary a href link
> is not loading the pa
I'm having a strange problem where clicking on an ordinary a href link
is not loading the page it points to properly in Firefox. Instead, it
is just jumbling up the placement of the page but not sending another
http request to the server. Please check this out:
http://constructioncapitalsource.c
