"Then the same could be said of a simple definition list. I would like to agree with you, but am not quite comfortable with that argument."
You're saying you're uncomfortable using tables to present tabular data even though that is what tables are for? "I ask this becouse I still see many famous and really relevant websites with a dirty table-based soup layout. I wonder wether was lazy, or if he didn't know that he could do it with divs and CSS or if he knew that this kind of" layout was viable to do with CSS." Yes, part of the problem is that many people (including some people on this list) don't know that there is a legitimate use for tables. They think, "If the layout for this site can be done with CSS then we won't need tables anywhere on the site." What we here should be doing is having someone present a layout they think can only be done with tables and see if it can be done with CSS. And, yes, please continue to use tables for presenting tabular data. ________________________________________________________________________ Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
