2005/12/14, kenny heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than
> table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I
> was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this.
I think the major difference is that tables are usually not
On 16 Dec 2005, at 12:06 am, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>> My second questions is related to that, dose anyone know of any
>> resources on writing more optimised css. For example I was just
>> reading on this list in the talk comparing class to id and there was
>> mention there was performance difference
kenny heaton wrote:
>I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than
>table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I
>was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this.
I don't think a general study is possible, since the rendering time
depends largely on e
> I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than
> table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I
> was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this.
Not that I know of, but the main difference is that CSS layouts tend
to be a lot slicker than oldschool ta
I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than
table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I
was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this.
My second questions is related to that, dose anyone know of any
resources on writing more optimised css. For exa
