On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:11:53PM -0400, David Laakso wrote:
BTW, red on green may be difficult for some users, too.
Impossible to distinguish by certain types of color blind people,
actually.
Ángel
__
css-discuss
Noah Learner wrote:
Hey all,
I am working on relaunching http://www.fureyresearch.com
What do you think?
Any feedback about aesthetics or layout would be greatly
appreciated.
It seems to do fairly well cross-browser, except for a
missing header on at least one page in
My first thought is the graphic in the upper left that shows a severe
decline is, perhaps, not the best choice for an investment site where, I
assume, they are supposed to be making money...
On 7/14/09 10:26 PM, Noah Learner noahlear...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on relaunching
Hey all,
I am working on relaunching http://www.fureyresearch.com What do you think?
Any feedback about aesthetics or layout would be greatly appreciated.
--
Noah Learner
LEARNER DESIGN
www.learnerdesign.com
31C Bartlett Farm Road | Nantucket, MA 02554
508.325.6626
LEAVE YOUR MARK*
Noah Learner wrote:
Hey all,
I am working on relaunching http://www.fureyresearch.com What do you think?
Any feedback about aesthetics or layout would be greatly appreciated.
It seems to do fairly well cross-browser, except for a missing header on
at least one page in IE/6.0. It is
It would be really nice if someone could provide the OP with an open,
honest, direct, and specific solution to his problem. I regret I am
unable to do so.
Best,
~d
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
MEM wrote:
Give the form an explicit width. It doesn't need to be hidden from
other browsers.
e.g. #form_login { width: 11.75em; }
I was doing clear:left; both; overflows, comment those lines, put them back.
I was thinking about some lines on my css that should start with moz- ...
Alan Gresley wrote:
MEM wrote:
Give the form an explicit width. It doesn't need to be hidden from
other browsers.
e.g. #form_login { width: 11.75em; }
I was doing clear:left; both; overflows, comment those lines, put them back.
I was thinking about some lines
Alan Gresley wrote:
MEM wrote:
Give the form an explicit width. It doesn't need to be hidden from
other browsers.
e.g. #form_login { width: 11.75em; }
I was doing clear:left; both; overflows, comment those lines, put them back.
I was thinking about some lines
On Jul 12, 2009, at 6:29 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Alan Gresley wrote:
...
e.g. #form_login { width: 11.75em; }
I was doing clear:left; both; overflows, comment those lines, put
them back.
I was thinking about some lines on my css that should start with
moz- ...
And here it is, a
Is this the bug present in FF2 or SeaMonkey? Anyone?
Yes, it is present, as well, in:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.20)
Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
That is hardly surprising. All those browsers (Camino 1.6.x, SeaMonkey
1.x, Firefox
Give the form an explicit width. It doesn't need to be hidden from
other browsers.
e.g. #form_login { width: 11.75em; }
I was doing clear:left; both; overflows, comment those lines, put them back.
I was thinking about some lines on my css that should start with moz- ...
And here it is,
MEM wrote:
Hello again list,
We always can do better and better, this is my second css layout, so I know
it's mediocre, anyway:
Actually, you're doing quite well, regardless of your personal choice
for font-family :-) . My second CSS layout was exactly like my first
CSS layout:
Actually, you're doing quite well,
Thanks.
regardless of your personal choice
for font-family :-)
I see...
http://virtuelvis.com/archives/2004/01/avoid-verdana
Well, if Unix distros don't have it by default.
I must declare on the CSS Verdana alternatives.
However, doing that, will cause
Check your page in SeaMonkey/1.1.17.
No I get the same symptoms on Firefox 2.
So the problem is that, on SeaMonkey 1.1.17,
The problem is in FF/2x, SeaMonkey, and also Camino.
I'm unable to contain the float
? Should I apply a clear fix method, or a
if you want to just forget FF/2x; and, ride with a broken page in
SeaMonkey and Camino until such time as they catch-up?
The site is far away from been launch. And SeaMonkey is absolutely
inexistent on this side.
But the fact that affects also Firefox 2 - bugs me.
The correction for FF2x,
On 10/07/2009, at 3:44 PM, MEM wrote:
Unfortunately, there is still a lot of people that uses FF2 on this
side of
Atlantic. Can I have help on solving that issue?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/
20090605
SeaMonkey/1.1.17
Doesn't display properly
On 10/07/2009, at 3:59 PM, Tim Snadden wrote:
On 10/07/2009, at 3:44 PM, MEM wrote:
Unfortunately, there is still a lot of people that uses FF2 on this
side of
Atlantic. Can I have help on solving that issue?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/
20090605
18 matches
Mail list logo
