On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton:
http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neutonsubset=latin
My web page that uses it:
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
David Laakso wrote:
Ditch Neuton.
Go to
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rory Bernstein r...@rorybernstein.comwrote:
On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton:
http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neutonsubset=latin
My web page that uses it:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rory Bernstein r...@rorybernstein.com wrote:
My web page that uses it:
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
and I was expecting better results. Can I get some feedback from the list
about whether people are seeing the san-serif font in
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Rory Bernstein r...@rorybernstein.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rory Bernstein r...@rorybernstein.com
wrote:
My web page that uses it:
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
and I was expecting better results. Can I get
Yes, titillium in those two instances. Wouldn't expect it to be different
but checked in Safari (win), Chrome, Opera, IE 7,8 and it's present in
all.
Bill
--
Hi,
I downloaded and installed Seamonkey 2.02 (Windows). Why not? :)
Looks like Arial being displayed in those same two instances.
smallvoiceshout...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, titillium in those two instances. Wouldn't expect it to be
different but checked in Safari (win), Chrome, Opera, IE 7,8 and it's
present in all.
Bill
--
Hi,
I downloaded and installed Seamonkey 2.02 (Windows). Why not? :)
One reason would be because
One reason would be because the release version is 2.0.11 !
Where did you find an archived 2.0.2 ?
Philip Taylor
Of course you're correct, Philip. Maybe Rory's font would render if it
*were* v2.02 :) Thanks for the correction.
Bill
Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the
san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not working
on many browsers, then I have some big problems!
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
Thanks, Rory
Titillum
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rory Bernstein r...@rorybernstein.com wrote:
Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the
san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not
working on many browsers, then I have some big problems!
On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rory Bernstein r...@rorybernstein.com
wrote:
Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the
san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not
working on
Ah. I see the light. OK, I just uploaded the OTF files. Can I now assume
that this font will show for most users?
Thank you so much for this help,
Rory
Now good in Seamonkey.
Bill
__
css-discuss
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Ah. I see the light. OK, I just uploaded the OTF files. Can I now assume that
this font will show for most users?
Thank you so much for this help,
Rory
Trailer looks really horrible in Seamonkey 2.0.11 under
Windows/XP;SP3 at 1152 x 864, and 3 in page numbers
looks
On 1/3/11 5:07 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
The Titillium is showing in all the above browsers now on reload, probably
because you have uploaded missing files since I last wrote...
~d
Thanks, David. Is there nothing I can do to get this
On 2011/01/03 17:26 (GMT-0500) David Laakso composed:
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Is there nothing I can do to get this working in Camino? Or is @font-face just
not an option for Camino currently?
Your help was so appreciated on this issue.
Camino is completely volunteer supported; and,
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
My issue is that the font weight is heavier in the browser than it looked in
our photoshop comp. Is there any way, using CSS, to get the font weight to
look lighter (less bold)? Or do I just explain to the designer that the way
text
Chetan Crasta wrote:
The issues described by Phillip are
due to Windows' horrible rendering of @font-face embedded fonts.
Windows XP, Vista and 7 do not correctly apply font smoothing to
embedded fonts. The issue affects all browsers on the windows
platform.
Do you have a citation for this,
On Jan 2, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote:
Phillip are
due to Windows' horrible rendering of @font-face embedded fonts.
Windows XP, Vista and 7 do not correctly apply font smoothing to
embedded fonts. The issue affects all browsers on the windows
platform.
I don't think this is true
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
In general, the fonts I've used did/do look pretty good on all Windows OS
Do have you have some sample pages that I can compare
with the Newton offering, Philippe ?
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Do you have a citation for this, Chetan ? I'd be interested
to read more concerning this artifact of Windows.
Apart from the link given earlier [1], I found two more articles that
describe the issue:
On Jan 2, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote:
Every font that I have embedded looked better in Linux.
You're comparing apples and oranges. Windows (and XP especially) and Linux, or
OS X. What you have to compare is font-rendering on the same platform for
embedded vs native (installed)
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges. Windows (and XP especially) and Linux,
or OS X. What you have to compare is font-rendering on the same platform for
embedded vs native (installed) fonts.
Few web designers have
On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
Hi,
I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton:
http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neutonsubset=latin
Here is a coded page that uses it. See left column (nav menu), the top-category
text (the serif text, not the san serif),
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
Ditch Neuton.
Go to Font Squirrel.
http://www.fontsquirrel.com/
Download Calluna and install it.
Go back to Font Squirrel and use their fontface generator [expert setting].
As David suggested, the Rory's only
On 1/2/11 10:51 AM, Chetan Crasta wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
Ditch Neuton.
Go to Font Squirrel.
http://www.fontsquirrel.com/
Download Calluna and install it.
Go back to Font Squirrel and use their fontface generator [expert
I am grateful for all the activity about my question (@font-face). I am too
sick today to really take it all in; but I wanted to quickly respond. I will
get back to you early next week.
Happy New Year everyone!
Rory
__
Hi,
I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton:
http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neutonsubset=latin
Here is a coded page that uses it. See left column (nav menu), the top-category
text (the serif text, not the san serif), that is bigger. The text that reads:
Not convinced you are doing your client any favours
by using that : I have to zoom in by a factor of
four before the glyphs stop breaking up :-(
Seamonkey 2.0.11, Win/XP;SP3 @ 1152 x 864.
Philip Taylor
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Hi,
I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called
Rory Bernstein wrote:
Thanks for the screenshots, Phillip.
You're very welcome.
What I find most disturbing is that the other font (the sans
serif one) is not even showing up for you; it is rendering in
some other font. (I'm talking about the grey, all caps items in
the nav bar). How
On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive
Rory
aside
Comment this out in the source file and shoot the designer :-) .
linkhref='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Neuton
view-source:http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Neuton'
29 matches
Mail list logo
