Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

tedd wrote: > [...] Georg: > >Oh, not so -- gifted one. Please review: :-) > >http://sperling.com/david/ > >[...] but the defaults seem to hold together well, see: > >http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=284361 > >Comments? > > Yes: both links are 404 files... ;-) Already cleansweeped?

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

At 8:29 PM +0200 9/14/06, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >tedd wrote: >>http://sperling.com/david/ >> >>My em sizing of the image fixed the zoom problem reported with my browser. > >:-) > >Yes, and may be well suited for an 'em-sized' layout. Use that solution >in that kind of layouts, if you like. Forgive

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

tedd wrote: > http://sperling.com/david/ > > My em sizing of the image fixed the zoom problem reported with my > browser. :-) Yes, and may be well suited for an 'em-sized' layout. Use that solution in that kind of layouts, if you like. That particular layout is /designed/ to adjust to the avai

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

At 5:04 PM +0200 9/14/06, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >tedd wrote: > > As you know, one way to fix this is by setting the dimensions of the >> image in ems. > >Em-sizing won't solve the problem in this case. The layout is >'em-guided', not 'em-sized'. Georg: Oh, not so -- gifted one. Please review:

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > tedd wrote: > >>> >>> > > >> In Safari 2.0.4 Mac OS-X 10.4.7, the oval image is cropped on the >> right as one zooms down. >> > > Will happen in all browsers just by making the window narrow enough. > > >> A

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

tedd wrote: >> > In Safari 2.0.4 Mac OS-X 10.4.7, the oval image is cropped on the > right as one zooms down. Will happen in all browsers just by making the window narrow enough. > As you know, one way to fix this is by setting the dimensions of the

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

At 9:10 PM -0400 9/13/06, ~davidLaakso wrote: >A quick check of this simple page > with what you are running >is appreciated. Just trying to pull out any problems or issues that I >may have overlooked, or that I am not aware of. >Thanks. >~dL David: I

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

Jono wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: >> A quick check of this simple page >> with what you are >> running... >> > The page is verry long in IE 5 Mac - I suspect the "one True > Layout" for equal height columns is to blame; I didn't look in d

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

~davidLaakso wrote: > A quick check of this simple page > with what you are running... > The page is verry long in IE 5 Mac - I suspect the "one True Layout" for equal height columns is to blame; I didn't look in depth though. Whether th

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

Don Miller wrote: > Would it look better if the GIF white area were transparent? > The white box doesn't really look right with the rest of the page. > Otherwise, a good elastic design. > > Don > > > | A quick check of this simple page > | with what yo

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

david wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: > >> david wrote: >> >>> ~davidLaakso wrote: >>> A quick check of this simple page with what you are running is appreciated. Just trying to pull out any problems or issues that I

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

~davidLaakso wrote: > david wrote: >> ~davidLaakso wrote: >>> A quick check of this simple page >>> with what you are >>> running is appreciated. Just trying to pull out any problems or >>> issues that I may have overlooked, or that I am not aware o

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

david wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: >> A quick check of this simple page >> with what you are >> running is appreciated. Just trying to pull out any problems or >> issues that I may have overlooked, or that I am not aware of. > > The column for the s

[css-d] page review :: ~dL

A quick check of this simple page with what you are running is appreciated. Just trying to pull out any problems or issues that I may have overlooked, or that I am not aware of. Thanks. ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

I apologize, my post was not meant offensive in any sense. Happy new year Ingo -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-d

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The > first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." > > Thanks, > ~davidLaakso David, XPSP2, Firefox, text zoomed to a normal human readable size, the

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

> The meta attribute to automatically move the reader from one page to another is older than me. True, but your case, I think it should be one second longer ;-) < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second > Happy New Year, and thank you all for welcoming me to the list. Tony

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:32:40AM -0500, David Laakso wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Laakso wrote: > >>Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The > >>first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." > >>

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

tedd wrote: >> Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The >> first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." >> >> Thanks, >> ~davidLaakso > > > That's more than a paper-bag you just programmed out of (private joke).

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

>Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The >first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." > >Thanks, >~davidLaakso david: That's more than a paper-bag you just programmed out of (private joke). I never saw -- -

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

>On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Laakso wrote: >> Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The >> first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." >> > >I don't understand that. What's the point? Is it

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

Kevin Cannon wrote: >On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Laakso wrote: > > >>Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The >>first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." >> >> >> > >I don't understan

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Laakso wrote: > > Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a > little :-P . The > > first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." > > > > I don't understand that. What's the point

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Laakso wrote: > Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The > first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." > I don't understand that. What's the point? Is it one of t

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

Hi David On 29 Dec 2005, at 03:42, David Laakso wrote: > Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The > first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." Totally off-beat but simply brilliant. You have a remarkable eye. HaPpy nEw yeaR to you and eVerYone eLse. -- R

Re: [css-d] page review :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . > The first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." > The "next" person who saw it thought it was weirder, but liked it nevertheless. Many times the same

[css-d] page review :: ~dL

Comments and suggestions appreciated. It has changed a little :-P . The first person who saw it thought it was "too weird." Thanks, ~davidLaakso __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http