Are there any good lists--populated by serious developers, like this
one--wear "on topic" includes all the trades real developers use, like
server side scripting, databases, javascript AND CSS? There are many such
forums. But forums tend to be populated by beginners while lists tend to
be populat
nov 25 2014 17:49 Barney Carroll :
> A task runner like Gulp would be useful for this kind of thing. This guy
> wrote an excellent introduction (and starter kit) [0] that covers automated
> SASS & Browserify code compilation and filesystem-browser synchronisation.
>
> I've used Gulp for my las
Barney Carroll wrote:
That's an interesting approach. Any particular reason(s) not to use HTML5
at all times?
Yes, but this is not the place to discuss it/them !
Philip Taylor
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
htt
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, Philip Taylor wrote:
> …HTML 5, but ONLY if new elements such as , or are
> required.
>
That's an interesting approach. Any particular reason not to use HTML5 at
all times?
--
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
"Validating CSS : When ?" --
For me :
a) Whenever something does not behave as anticipated;
b) Before signing anything off as complete.
If it fails at either stage, then ensure that any deviations from the
specification are (a) intentional, (b) essential, and (c) have no
undesirable or unant
>
> I only run stylesheets through the validator when: 1) I can not find one
> of my own "disable this declaration" markers, 2) I can not manage to debug
> a problem in browsers locally, and/or 3) I have to share my CSS code with a
> developer who is paranoid when it comes to validity -- something
Den 25.11.2014 10:50, skrev MiB:
As I often feel inclined to use vendor-prefixes in order to meet business
requirements, my CSS typically don’t validate fully. I always know why and
using SASS have shielded me somewhat from seeing this issue, as I can postpone
any prefixes to the final phase.
A task runner like Gulp would be useful for this kind of thing. This guy
wrote an excellent introduction (and starter kit) [0] that covers automated
SASS & Browserify code compilation and filesystem-browser synchronisation.
I've used Gulp for my last 2 major project for all my development and buil
As I often feel inclined to use vendor-prefixes in order to meet business
requirements, my CSS typically don’t validate fully. I always know why and
using SASS have shielded me somewhat from seeing this issue, as I can postpone
any prefixes to the final phase. Are you developers handling this d
Mostly to give a different POV here...
> I was discussing some CSS techniques the other day and someone brought up
a
> point of a certain "fix" that I use not validating in the CSS validator. I
> have never really been overly concerned with validating my stylesheets as
> long as the html was good.
2009/8/27 jeffrey morin :
> I was discussing some CSS techniques the other day and someone brought up a
> point of a certain "fix" that I use not validating in the CSS validator. I
> have never really been overly concerned with validating my stylesheets as
> long as the html was good. Is there a ce
To me, that's like saying that you don't care if your text or layout
looks okay, as long as the HTML is okay. Or saying you don't care if
it works in any other browser except IE6, or any other platform than
the PC. That might be fine for a site only you and a few friends are
going to visit,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:57:36 -0400
Came this utterance formulated by jeffrey morin to my mailbox:
> I was discussing some CSS techniques the other day and someone brought
> up a point of a certain "fix" that I use not validating in the CSS
> validator. I have never really been overly concerned wit
I was discussing some CSS techniques the other day and someone brought up a
point of a certain "fix" that I use not validating in the CSS validator. I
have never really been overly concerned with validating my stylesheets as
long as the html was good. Is there a certain benefit to validating your C
Jen Strickland wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've validated my code, and wanted to be tidy and validate my css, so
> I tried using http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
>
> ... and it validates, but has warnings. I understand why, but it's so
> confusing how all the background-colors need to be accounte
Hello!
I've validated my code, and wanted to be tidy and validate my css, so
I tried using http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
... and it validates, but has warnings. I understand why, but it's so
confusing how all the background-colors need to be accounted for. Is
there some handy-dandy
Christopher Blake wrote:
> I am trying to validate this site;
> http://www.neilp.newwavemedia.co.uk/index.html
> http://www.neilp.newwavemedia.co.uk/stylefile/style1.css
> It has this error report;
> Servlet has thrown exception:javax.servlet.ServletException: Timed out
>
It (the w3c validation
* Christopher Blake wrote:
>It has this error report;
>Servlet has thrown exception:javax.servlet.ServletException: Timed out
This is some internal error, there is presumably nothing you can do
about it. You should download the style sheet to your computer and
use the file upload feature of the va
Hi all,
I am trying to validate this site;
http://www.neilp.newwavemedia.co.uk/index.html
http://www.neilp.newwavemedia.co.uk/stylefile/style1.css
The xml now validates thanks to some wonderful help from david Laasko
but the css won't.
It has this error report;
Servlet has thrown exception:
19 matches
Mail list logo
