Re: [css-d] valid xhtml and css smooth text

2006-05-04 Thread Ian Young
> hi al, > > i wanna know if it possible to have smooth scrolling text (ie. > http://www.dynamicdrive.com/dynamicindex2/cmarquee.htm) but > standard compliant dan validate ? > > Don't think this is really a CSS issue as the main problems with marquees are making them W3 compliant - now that ticks t

Re: [css-d] valid xhtml

2005-05-25 Thread Muammar Kris Khaira
The space between r and / is not required. On May 24, 2005, at 2:18 AM, Arnie Shafer wrote: Change to: Note the space between "r" and "/". __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d Li

Re: [css-d] valid xhtml

2005-05-23 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this a valid xhtml? abc abc abc abc abc abc You should ask the W3C validator... :-) ...no, it isn't valid. Use (html) or (xhtml) instead of . regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no __ c

Re: [css-d] valid xhtml

2005-05-23 Thread Arnie Shafer
No it is not valid as shown. Change to: Note the space between "r" and "/". Arnie Shafer - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 1:41 PM Subject: [css-d] valid xhtml is this a valid xhtml? abc abc abc abc abc abc _

RE: [css-d] valid xhtml

2005-05-23 Thread Mickey Slater
No its not. Your breaks should readand then it will validate. M!ckey. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:41 AM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: [css-d] valid xhtml is this a va

Re: [css-d] valid xhtml

2005-05-23 Thread volker
no, you need to write it this way you can test it here if it is valid http://validator.w3.org volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: is this a valid xhtml? abc abc abc abc abc abc __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.