apr 27 2014 18:34 Tom Livingston :
> Perhaps I'm using "list" in a more general term. Someone *on* the list
> has been compromised. And you are correct, it is difficult to figure
> out where it's coming from. My main point was that I don't get these
> messages outside of this list.
While the me
On 27/04/2014 04:45, John wrote:
I'm having trouble seeing what I'm doing, in a manner of speaking, at 320px.
FF will show me most of what's happening with the responsive view, but since
I'm working on a
desktop, I still have "hover" behavior, plus there seems to be something in the
way of
sel
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> Actually, I believe it has. I get those as do some others, and I only
>> get them as replies to CSS-D threads. Mr. Meyer is aware of this
>> issue.
>
>
> But what can he do about it, since there is no way for h
Tom Livingston wrote:
Actually, I believe it has. I get those as do some others, and I only
get them as replies to CSS-D threads. Mr. Meyer is aware of this
issue.
But what can he do about it, since there is no way for him to know
which of the list subscribers has set up an auto-responder to
Actually, I believe it has. I get those as do some others, and I only
get them as replies to CSS-D threads. Mr. Meyer is aware of this
issue.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Philip Taylor wrote:
> No, by subscribing to this list, you make your e-mail address
> accessible to others; you then ris
No, by subscribing to this list, you make your e-mail address
accessible to others; you then risk receiving spam, as you
have done in this case.
Philip Taylor
John wrote:
Uh…I got 2 response to my question which were obviously
spam..individuals taking photos of themselves..Has the list
Uh…I got 2 response to my question which were obviously spam..individuals
taking photos of themselves..Has the list been compromised?
John
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/c
