On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Paul wrote:
> I remember reading that somewhere also so I will give a try on my next go.
> Should I be using em instead of px?
>
>
>
> Brad Frost explains:
http://bradfrostweb.com/blog/post/7-habits-of-highly-effective-media-queries/#relative
--
Tom Livingst
I remember reading that somewhere also so I will give a try on my next go.
Should I be using em instead of px?
>>>
>>> Site can be viewed temporarily at:
>>> http://www.sportsmanfishing.com/webdev/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> I usually develop mobile first with all my base styles for phone width.
Thanks for your quick reply Tom. The display:inline did the trick. I was
under the impression that I needed a media query for anything below 321
which is why I left the second media query there. It was actually created
for me from the online tool I used to get started. Maybe I'm
misunderstanding
> On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Paul > wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone, I am relatively new to responsive design and css with
>> media queries and have used an online tool to generate my template and
>> then customized it as I went along to try and learn. I seem to have it
>> working well as far as
Also, the button works on my iPhone 5s.
On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Paul wrote:
> Hello everyone, I am relatively new to responsive design and css with
> media queries and have used an online tool to generate my template and
> then customized it as I went along to try and learn. I seem to
Two things. You might want to check support for 'run-in'. Will
display:inline; work?
Also, those two MQs result in the same thing. Seems unnecessary to have
both.
On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Paul wrote:
> Hello everyone, I am relatively new to responsive design and css with
> media queries
