Re: [css-d] Site-Check - LAMeeraTrust.org

2006-01-11 Thread Felix Miata
Rahul Gonsalves wrote Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:10:25 +0530: > http://lameeratrust.org/ > 2. It's a fixed-width layout. ;-) Why? I see nothing that makes it necessary. http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/rahulg3.jpg -- "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord."Psalm 33:12 NIV Team OS/2 ** R

Re: [css-d] Site-Check - LAMeeraTrust.org

2006-01-08 Thread francky
Hello Rahul and others, I've read all the good comments, and made an adapted "zoom-proof" testpage . I didn't like myself that the first one wasn't liquid enough. - The nav-items above the logo makes things a lot easier. The

Re: [css-d] Site-Check - LAMeeraTrust.org

2006-01-08 Thread Rahul Gonsalves
Dear David, Holly: @Holly 1. Increasing Text-size in FF obscures text significantly. Does anybody have a fix? Changing the height to min-height in the .nav selector seems to keep the content below the expanded/wrapped navagition items. That fixed it very nicely, thank you :-) Due to their lar

Re: [css-d] Site-Check - LAMeeraTrust.org

2006-01-08 Thread Holly Bergevin
From: Rahul Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >http://lameeratrust.org/ >1. Increasing Text-size in FF obscures text significantly. Does anybody >have a fix? Changing the height to min-height in the .nav selector seems to keep the content below the expanded/wrapped navagition items. Due to their l

Re: [css-d] Site-Check - LAMeeraTrust.org

2006-01-08 Thread David Laakso
Rahul Gonsalves wrote: >The site: >http://lameeratrust.org/ >Problems that I am aware of: >1. Increasing Text-size in FF obscures text significantly. Does anybody >have a fix? >2. It's a fixed-width layout. ;-) >Rahul. > It seems like a relatively simple layout problem. I would suggest: 1/ Increa