On 15 Jun 2005, at 2:04 am, Rachael Beale (CSS-Discuss) wrote:
Page:
http://www.petrucci-ensemble.org.uk/redesign/petrucci-redesign-
debug.html
CSS: http://www.petrucci-ensemble.org.uk/redesign/style-debug.css
Is this a known issue/correct behaviour? And if so, is there a way
round it that
hmm, there must be something wrong with this solution, or in providing a
solution at all.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
S
Valette Ragland, Adam Kuehn and Eric A. Meyer wrote (variations on a
theme):
Actually, it starts exactly where you placed it. It's just that
repeat-y means exactly that: the image is repeated in both directions
along the y axis-- in other words, both up AND down.
Aha - I appear to have f
Ingo Chao schrieb:
...
#wrapper { position: relative; margin: 1em 5em; padding: 0 25px 0 0;
background: rgb(241, 234, 153) url('border-r.jpg') scroll 100% 70px
repeat-y ;}
#maincontent { padding: 70px 0px 0px 25px; background: transparent
url('border-l.jpg') repeat-y scroll left 70px; }
#
Rachael Beale (CSS-Discuss) schrieb:
When I set the background-repeat on the right-hand border to repeat-y,
I can no longer seem to control the image's initial vertical position
(i.e. it starts immediately at the top of the div rather than, say,
70px down).
Page:
http://www.petrucci-ensemble.org
At 6:04 PM +0100 6/14/05, Rachael Beale (CSS-Discuss) wrote:
When I set the background-repeat on the right-hand border to repeat-y,
I can no longer seem to control the image's initial vertical position
(i.e. it starts immediately at the top of the div rather than, say,
70px down).
Actually,
ect: Re: [css-d] Using background-position and background-repeat together
> Sent: 14 Jun 2005 13:09:39
>
> On 6/14/05, Ray Dickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> || You cannot vertically position a background image that is repeated
> on the y-axis.Similarily,
> || you can'
Ray Dickman wrote:
> > When I set the background-repeat on the right-hand border to repeat-y,
> I can no longer seem to control the image's initial vertical position
> (i.e. it starts immediately at the top of the div rather than, say,
> > 70px down).
> >
> Is this a known
You could double div the "maincontent" area to get something you can both
left and right border.
i.e. blah, blah
One gets the left border, one gets the right border. Not very elegant, but
it works and it's valid.
E
On 6/14/05, Rachael Beale (CSS-Discuss) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear
On 6/14/05, Ray Dickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|| You cannot vertically position a background image that is repeated
on the y-axis.Similarily,
|| you can't horizontally position a background image that is repeated
on x-axis.
This is not quite right. You can vertically position a background
im
I'm trying to simulate an image border on a central content area, by
adding the right-hand border to a wrapper div and the left-hand to the
main content area inside it.
Why can't you do the right side exactly the same as the left? abs
- Original Message -
From: "Rachael Beale (CSS-Disc
I believe this is the correct (or at least prevelant) behaviour. You cannot
vertically position a background image that is repeated on the
y-axis. Similarily, you can't horizontally position a background image that is
repeated on x-axis.
That's been my experience anyway!
---
Ray Dickman
D2 Di
12 matches
Mail list logo