On 4/9/09 1:37 PM, Michael Adams linux_m...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Divya - I disagree. IE7 handles the XML declaration fine in standards
mode[1]. Although i see it on line 8 when it should always be on line 1.
IMHO IE less than IE7 should always be in quirks mode and the XML
declaration will
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:44:04 -0700
Came this utterance formulated by Divya Manian to my mailbox:
On 4/9/09 1:37 PM, Michael Adams linux_m...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Divya - I disagree. IE7 handles the XML declaration fine in
standards mode[1]. Although i see it on line 8 when it should
Divya Manian wrote:
You can try using :first-line [1]. Probably use a br/ to separate
the lines? Not sure if it will work though (Certainly not semantic!).
It would work technically well (:first-line has been in CSS since CSS 1.0
and is widely supported), but introducing an extra line break
Hi;
I used Firefox to view my website on a friend's zillion-pixel-wide new Mac,
yesterday, and I was astonished to find that all elements on all pages had a
significantly increased width, so that the design was effectively spread,
horizontally, to fit the (maximized) window. This would have
On Apr 10, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Michael Leibson wrote:
I used Firefox to view my website on a friend's zillion-pixel-wide
new Mac, yesterday, and I was astonished to find that all elements
on all pages had a significantly increased width, so that the design
was effectively spread,
Michael Leibson wrote:
I used Firefox to view my website on a friend's zillion-pixel-wide
new Mac, yesterday, and I was astonished to find that all elements on
all pages had a significantly increased width, so that the design
was effectively spread, horizontally, to fit the (maximized)
I used Firefox to view my website on a friend's zillion-pixel-wide
new Mac, yesterday, and I was astonished to find that all elements
on all pages had a significantly increased width, so that the design
was effectively spread, horizontally, to fit the (maximized)
window. This would
Besides, if you can and wish to add extra markup, you might just as well
introduce b or strong (or some other inline element, to be styled), and
then you would not need to create an extra line break.
No pure CSS solution (i.e. an approach that does not require any added
markup to separate
If anyone's interested in trying to see if they can break the pages again, I'd
love to have you try :) Some of the places I previously spotted it happening
are below:
http://www.kenyon.edu/x12366.xml
http://www.kenyon.edu/x7904.xml
http://www.kenyon.edu/x14305.xml
Seems to me to be behaving as the stylesheet intends.
Thanks, Peter!
- Michael
From: Peter Hammarling pe...@artworkers.net
To: Michael Leibson michael_mabe...@yahoo.ca
Cc: CSS-D css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:07:05 AM
Subject: Re:
Hi, David;
It is in part due to the width of 1426px set on #background and the
issue you have is not limited to FF-- it happens in all browsers.
Structuring a layout with absolute positioning seldom works.
Care to amplify (no pun intended) that? All I can so far determine is that my
friend
Far from being a waste of time, I think your answer zoomed in (excuse the pun)
on the key thing, Theophan, so thank-you! I hadn't even thought of a 'zoom'
feature on my friend's machine.
However, I've subsequently had my friend check her Firefox 3.0.8 zoom, and she
said:
I reset to 0 and
Hi, Georg, and thanks for this detailed reply!
your page is full of markup errors...
Thanks for bringing these to my attention -- I'll look into all of them when
some time becomes available.
Related questions: why, if using an li without an ordered or unordered list
is not allowed, does it
Rebecca Mazur wrote:
If anyone's interested in trying to see if they can break the pages again,
I'd
love to have you try :) Some of the places I previously spotted it happening
are below:
All checked in IE/6.0 (only) on a cleared cache.
http://www.kenyon.edu/x12366.xml
Footer
Thanks, Phillipe!
Here is how it looks like, when I force the window to the width of the
monitor -windoze users call that full screen or something:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_b/ml.png
I zoomed the text, note how the selected part overflows the sand background
(and is then unreadable).
Wow, pretty
I am a web-design teacher who's in the process of putting his documentation
online, but I also want my students to occasionnally print the pages.
The situation is as follows:
I do not want paragraphs to be broken by a page break.
I have include the following rule in my stylesheet:
p
On 2009/04/10 13:46 (GMT-0700) Michael Leibson composed:
http://www.thinkingmusic.ca/
I intentionally made the font size super-big, in the hope that everyone
who can read will be able to do so without text-zooming. Should I worry?
Worrying doesn't accomplish anything. Instead, learn the
Michael Leibson wrote:
[...] Related questions: why, if using an li without an ordered
or unordered list is not allowed, does it work on my site? What are
the negative consequences of using it that way?
1: you're relying on browsers' error correction, which may or may not
give the same
On Apr 11, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Michael Leibson wrote:
Thanks, Phillipe!
s/Phillipe/Philippe
Here is how it looks like, when I force the window to the width of
the
monitor -windoze users call that full screen or something:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_b/ml.png
I zoomed the text, note how the
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:43:27 -0400
Came this utterance formulated by Yvan Daneault to my mailbox:
I am a web-design teacher who's in the process of putting his
documentation online, but I also want my students to occasionnally
print the pages. The situation is as follows:
I do not want
20 matches
Mail list logo
