This a little of topic, but still css related. :)
I'm desperate. :)
Indeed.
Any known way to force the browser to not use compatibility mode at all ?
(without going to each bad browser users and yelling at them that, despite not
being there fault on such a stupid decision, they still
Won't the correct DTD (e.g., HTML 4.01 Strict) accomplish that ?
mem wrote:
This a little of topic, but still css related. :)
I'm desperate. :)
Indeed.
Any known way to force the browser to not use compatibility mode at all ?
(without going to each bad browser users and yelling at them
On Jan 13, 2012, at 10:43 , Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Won't the correct DTD (e.g., HTML 4.01 Strict) accomplish that ?
Arrgh! My bad. I'm talking about an HTML5 page.
Something like this seems to help, but I've seen a lot of comments telling
that, that isn't applied on all users.
meta
Ah, can't help you there. From a purely personal perspective,
I see no point in using HTML 5 until there is a formal, ratified,
W3C specification for it, rather than (as at present) a work in
progress, intend[ed] to replace HTML 3.2, HTML 4, and XHTML 1.x. [1]
Philip Taylor
[1]
On Jan 13, 2012, at 7:52 PM, mem wrote:
Something like this seems to help, but I've seen a lot of comments telling
that, that isn't applied on all users.
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=edge
it is supposed to work, according to the MS docs
or, if you're on apache 2, stick
On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:01 , Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jan 13, 2012, at 7:52 PM, mem wrote:
Something like this seems to help, but I've seen a lot of comments telling
that, that isn't applied on all users.
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=edge
it is supposed to work,
Hello all,
I have this on my application:
!--[if lt IE 9]
link rel=stylesheet href=badbrowser.css/
![endif]--
Earlier I have declared the main.css (the one valid for all), with this:
#some-selector {
width: 16em;
}
On this badbrowser.css I have:
Any known way to force the browser to not use compatibility mode at all ?
(without going to each bad browser users and yelling at them that, despite
not being there fault on such a stupid decision, they still shouldn't use
it) ?
Use meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=edge and this
What am I doing wrong? Is the the expected behavior ?
A link to the page in question might help if you can provide it
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
I forgot to mention this site http://caniuse.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies --
Hi. For the life of me, I can't figure out why this stripped down version
of a website I'm building won't scroll down. Is it the css?
_http://www.suffolksites.com/affordable_roofing_remodeling/trying.htm_
(http://www.suffolksites.com/affordable_roofing_remodeling/trying.htm)
Oh, disregard
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, bho...@aol.com wrote:
Hi. For the life of me, I can't figure out why this stripped down version
of a website I'm building won't scroll down. Is it the css?
It's the overflow: hidden on the body.
Cheers,
Micky
Hey thanks, but you have the wrong stylesheet. It's stylesheet2.css.
In a message dated 1/13/2012 7:24:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, bho...@aol.com wrote:
Hi. For the life of me, I can't figure out why this
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:31 PM, bho...@aol.com wrote:
Hey thanks, but you have the wrong stylesheet. It's stylesheet2.css.
Oh, sorry.
All I know is that when I visit:
http://www.suffolksites.com/affordable_roofing_remodeling/trying.htm
... and open FIrebug [1], there's on
Hi.
On Saturday 14 Jan 2012 at 00:31 bho...@aol.com wrote:
Hey thanks, but you have the wrong stylesheet. It's stylesheet2.css.
Javascript in the page is adding the following styling to the head element:
style type=text/css media=screenhtml {height:100%; background-color:
#ff;}body
Oh hey, wow. That was automatically generated code by Adobe Flash, and as
dumb as it sounds, it never dawned on me to look THERE for CSS.
That fixed it.
Thanks,
Bruce
In a message dated 1/13/2012 8:00:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
c...@wastedtimes.net writes:
Hi.
On Saturday 14 Jan 2012
Can anyone help me figure out why in iPad portrait mode the content DIV (the
one with the leather background) of the following page doesn't stretch all the
way to the right boundary?
http://porscherepairfountainvalley.com/contact.php
I have done a lot of debugging the best I can considering
On Jan 14, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Christian Ziebarth wrote:
Can anyone help me figure out why in iPad portrait mode the content DIV
(the one with the leather background) of the following page doesn't stretch
all the way to the right boundary?
Issue solved. Thanks! Now to get Firebug for iPad.
--Original Message--
From: Philippe Wittenbergh
To: Christian Ziebarth
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Strange iPad width issue
Sent: Jan 13, 2012 5:31 PM
On Jan 14, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Christian Ziebarth wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo
