Hi Tom,
I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to
100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set.
The max-width size keeps them from becoming too large on a big screen and the
min-width keeps them from becoming too small.
Any width that is between
(Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but this
is both combined. Sorry for the spam)
Hi Tom,
I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to
100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set.
The max-width size keeps them
>
> If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping
> the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would begin to
> scale before the rest.
For clarification: are you saying that's how you think it should work *or*
that is the desired effect you're going for?
List,
I have not run into this situation before and I am hoping I am just over
thinking it or it's a "can't see the forest for the trees" kind of thing.
Given this layout:
http://tomliv.com/css-d/grid-of-diff-sizes/grid-with-diff-sizes.jpg
The black boxes represent svg graphics. Text would be
Thanks Karl
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> (Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but
> this is both combined. Sorry for the spam)
>
> Hi Tom,
> I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers