Re: [css-d] Responsive grid layout with graphics and scaling

2016-06-29 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Hi Tom, I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to 100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set. The max-width size keeps them from becoming too large on a big screen and the min-width keeps them from becoming too small. Any width that is between

Re: [css-d] Responsive grid layout with graphics and scaling

2016-06-29 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
(Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but this is both combined. Sorry for the spam) Hi Tom, I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to 100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set. The max-width size keeps them

Re: [css-d] Responsive grid layout with graphics and scaling

2016-06-29 Thread Chris Rockwell
> > If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping > the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would begin to > scale before the rest. For clarification: are you saying that's how you think it should work *or* that is the desired effect you're going for?

[css-d] Responsive grid layout with graphics and scaling

2016-06-29 Thread Tom Livingston
List, I have not run into this situation before and I am hoping I am just over thinking it or it's a "can't see the forest for the trees" kind of thing. Given this layout: http://tomliv.com/css-d/grid-of-diff-sizes/grid-with-diff-sizes.jpg The black boxes represent svg graphics. Text would be

Re: [css-d] Responsive grid layout with graphics and scaling

2016-06-29 Thread Tom Livingston
Thanks Karl On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > (Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but > this is both combined. Sorry for the spam) > > Hi Tom, > I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers