[css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Crest Christopher
TheiPad & iPad mini are both the same CSS width but when previewing both devices; the iPad Mini give me problems with one element. Shouldn't the results be identical ? __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

[css-d] Element Size with border

2016-08-10 Thread Crest Christopher
I tent to work with alot of assets and hopefully someone can help me. I know the Web Development toolkits that come with all web browsers can show the element width & height. Is it possible to add a border to the element in pixels and include that when analyzing the elements size and position ?

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Yes. Very aware. That was the top google search results I found using crests key words. Being that he has been asking about retina images in the past, I felt it was worth noting the pixel dimensions. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Aug 10, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
I have an iPhone still on iOS 7. No iPad though. @crest - you do know you can view inspect element of any iPhone or iPad in safari desktop? safari also has a responsive design mode. Works best for iPhone and iPad emulation I have found. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Aug 10, 2016, at

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Crest Christopher
The last time I downloaded Safari for Windows, I didn't notice a difference with the emulated with Retina Devices in Chrome so I removed Safari. Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > I have an iPhone still on iOS 7. > No iPad though. > > @crest - you do know you can view inspect element of any iPhone or >

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
They are not the same resolution or size. The biggest difference between these tablets is screen density. The iPad mini's display is 7.9 inches diagonally, with 1024 x 768 resolution at 163 pixels per inch. The iPad with Retina display packs a punch — 9.7 inches, with 2048 x 1536 resolution

[css-d] Flexbox struggle

2016-08-10 Thread Tom Livingston
Listers, Can't post a link yet, but maybe you can still help me as I still don't have a firm grip on flex yet... Given:

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Chrome is built off of Gecko and Webkit anyway. Probably why you didn't see much difference. It "technically" IS Safari under the hood. As far as emulators go.. Makes sense to me to use Apple's web browser for testing for Apple devices. Makes sense to me to use Chrome for testing for Android

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 3:23 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > They are not the same resolution or size. > > The biggest difference between these tablets is screen density. > The iPad mini's display is 7.9 inches diagonally, with 1024 x 768 resolution > at 163 pixels per

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Crest Christopher
Philippe you have an actual iPad ? Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > >> >> On Aug 11, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Crest Christopher >> wrote: >> >> Although >> the simulator uses iOS 7.1.2 and since I know nothing of iOS, strictly >> Windows but from what may be possible is newer

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Crest Christopher
You are referring to the iPad 3,4 & Air. I meant the iPad 1,2. The iPad Pro is the largest at 2048 width. I guess I'm going to target these Apple devices with criteria other then device-width. Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > They are not the same resolution or size. > > The biggest difference

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 11:37 PM, Crest Christopher > wrote: > > TheiPad & iPad mini are both the same CSS width but when previewing both > devices; the iPad Mini give me problems with one element. Shouldn't the > results be identical ? Are you testing with real

Re: [css-d] Flexbox struggle

2016-08-10 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > a p:last-child{align-self: flex-end;} to get the last to stick to > the bottom of s, but this isn't working. Where am I messing it up? Perhaps: a p:last-child { margin-top: auto; } Philippe -- Philippe

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Crest Christopher
Unfortunately I have to rely on a emulator \ simulator that will mean that I may once the page is online encounter issues that will have to be fixed when those issues arise on whatever device that may be. In the mean-time, the iPad I'm testing on has a 1024x768 resolution. Chrome device

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-10 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Crest Christopher > wrote: > > Although > the simulator uses iOS 7.1.2 and since I know nothing of iOS, strictly > Windows but from what may be possible is newer versions of iOS may have > issues such as this fixed ? Latest iOS